Is posterior femoral cutaneous nerve block clinically relevant in awake foot and ankle surgery? Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: e171–2

Author(s):  
Duncan L. Hamilton
1986 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 350-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Hughes ◽  
T. C. K. Brown

An approach to blocking the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve at the point where its branches emerge from below the medial border of gluteus maximus is described. This is located by inserting the needle at a point one quarter of the distance from the ischial tuberosity to the greater trochanter in the gluteal fold and then feeling two distinct losses of resistance as superficial and deep fascia are penetrated with a short-bevelled needle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Johnson ◽  
Rebecca L. Johnson ◽  
Adam D. Niesen ◽  
David E. Stoike ◽  
Wojciech Pawlina

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 540-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared M. Kasper ◽  
Vibhor Wadhwa ◽  
Kelly M. Scott ◽  
Avneesh Chhabra

2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-614
Author(s):  
Yukiko TERAMOTO ◽  
Makoto ICHIMIYA ◽  
Yuko TAKITA ◽  
Yoshiaki YOSHIKAWA ◽  
Masahiko MUTO

Author(s):  
Beom Suk Kim ◽  
Kyungho Kim ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Jesse Seilern Und Seilern Und Aspang ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim

Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PB in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Methods: One-hundred-ten patients surgically treated for an ingrown toenail were enrolled. Sixty-six patients underwent DB, and 44 underwent PB. PB was performed under ultrasound-guidance via a 22-gauge needle with 15 mL of 1% lidocaine in the popliteal region. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at two-time points: pain with skin penetration and pain with the solution injection. Time to sensory block, duration of sensory block, need for additional injections, and adverse events were recorded. Results: PB group demonstrated significantly lower procedure-related pain than the DB group. Time to sensory block was significantly longer in the PB group (20.8 ± 4.6 versus 6.5 ± 1.6 minutes). The sensory block duration was significantly longer in the PB group (187.9 ± 22.0 versus 106.5 ± 19.1 minutes). Additional injections were required in 16 (24.2%) DB cases, while no additional injections were required in PB cases. Four adverse events occurred in the DB group and two in the PB group. Conclusion: PB was a less painful anesthetic procedure associated with a longer sensory block duration and fewer repeat injections compared with DB. The result of this study implicates that PB can be an alternative anesthetic option in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.


Author(s):  
Michael B Canales ◽  
Homer Huntley Matthew Reiner ◽  
Duane J Ehredt Mark Razzante

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document