scholarly journals Fusarium solani keratitis: role of antifungal susceptibility testing and identification to the species level for proper management

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Dallé Rosa ◽  
Karla Sheid ◽  
Claudete Locatelli ◽  
Diane Marinho ◽  
Luciano Goldani
Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Julia J. Shen ◽  
Maiken C. Arendrup ◽  
Shyam Verma ◽  
Ditte Marie L. Saunte

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Dermatophytosis is commonly encountered in the dermatological clinics. The main aetiological agents in dermatophytosis of skin and nails in humans are <i>Trichophyton</i> (<i>T</i>.) <i>rubrum</i>, <i>T. mentagrophytes</i> and <i>T. interdigitale</i> (former <i>T. mentagrophytes-</i>complex). Terbinafine therapy is usually effective in eradicating infections due to these species by inhibiting their squalene epoxidase (SQLE) enzyme, but increasing numbers of clinically resistant cases and mutations in the SQLE gene have been documented recently. Resistance to antimycotics is phenotypically determined by antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST). However, AFST is not routinely performed for dermatophytes and no breakpoints classifying isolates as susceptible or resistant are available, making it difficult to interpret the clinical impact of a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). <b><i>Summary:</i></b> PubMed was systematically searched for terbinafine susceptibility testing of dermatophytes on October 20, 2020, by two individual researchers. The inclusion criteria were <i>in vitro</i> terbinafine susceptibility testing of <i>Trichophyton (T.) rubrum</i>, <i>T. mentagrophytes</i> and <i>T. interdigitale</i> with the broth microdilution technique. The exclusion criteria were non-English written papers. Outcomes were reported as MIC range, geometric mean, modal MIC and MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> in which 50 or 90% of isolates were inhibited, respectively. The reported MICs ranged from &#x3c;0.001 to &#x3e;64 mg/L. The huge variation in MIC is partly explained by the heterogeneity of the <i>Trichophyton</i> isolates, where some originated from routine specimens (wild types) whereas others came from non-responding patients with a known SQLE gene mutation. Another reason for the great variation in MIC is the use of different AFST methods where MIC values are not directly comparable. High MICs were reported particularly in isolates with SQLE gene mutation. The following SQLE alterations were reported: F397L, L393F, L393S, H440Y, F393I, F393V, F415I, F415S, F415V, S443P, A448T, L335F/A448T, S395P/A448T, L393S/A448T, Q408L/A448T, F397L/A448T, I121M/V237I and H440Y/F484Y in terbinafine-resistant isolates.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 5026-5028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Álvarez-Pérez ◽  
Marta E. García ◽  
Teresa Peláez ◽  
Eva Martínez-Nevado ◽  
José L. Blanco

ABSTRACTRecent studies suggest that antifungal resistance in yeast isolates of veterinary origin may be an underdiagnosed threat. We tested a collection of 92 ascomycetous yeast isolates that were obtained in Spain from birds, mammals and insects for antifungal susceptibility. MICs to amphotericin B and azoles were low, and no resistant isolates were detected. Despite these results, and given the potential role of animals as reservoirs of resistant strains, continuous monitoring of antifungal susceptibility in the veterinary setting is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document