Biomechanical evaluation of magnesium plates for management of mandibular angle fracture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Altaib Abd Al Razik Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation

Osteosynthesis using cannulated headless Herbert screws in mandibular angle fracture treatment: A new approach?

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wallner ◽  
Knut Reinbacher ◽  
Matthias Feichtinger ◽  
Mauro Pau ◽  
Georg Feigl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture

scholarly journals A Prospective Study of Strut versus Miniplate for Fractures of Mandibular Angle

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Xue ◽  
John C. Koshy ◽  
Erik M. Wolfswinkel ◽  
William M. Weathers ◽  
Kristina P. Marsack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Angle Fracture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comminuted Fractures ◽  
Angle Fractures ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
To Receive

This prospective randomized clinical trial compared the treatment outcomes of strut plate and Champy miniplate in fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Patients with mandibular angle fracture were consented and enrolled into this study. Exclusion criteria include patients with severely comminuted fractures. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the strut plate or Champy miniplate for angle fracture fixation. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the outcome. A total of 18 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to receive either the strut plate or Champy miniplate. Out of which five patients were excluded postoperatively due to complex fracture resulting in postoperative maxillomandibular fixation. The final enrollment was 13 patients, N = 6 (strut) and N = 7 (Champy). There was no statistically significant difference in the pretreatment variables. Nine of these patients had other associated facial fractures, including parasymphyseal and subcondylar fractures. Most of the (11) patients had sufficient follow-up after surgery. Both groups exhibited successful clinical unions of the mandibular angle fractures. The complications associated with the mandibular angle were 20% in the strut plate group and 16.7% in the Champy group. One patient in the strut plate group had a parasymphyseal infection, requiring hardware removal. The strut plate demonstrated comparable surgical outcome as the Champy miniplate. It is a safe and effective alternative for management of mandibular angle fracture.

Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Cameron Braasch ◽  
A. Omar Abubaker
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture

Bilateral mandibular angle fracture: a rare entity

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla DOSIO ◽  
Matteo BRUCOLI ◽  
Paolo BOFFANO ◽  
Arnaldo BENECH
Keyword(s):  
Rare Entity ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document