Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Cameron Braasch ◽  
A. Omar Abubaker
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture

Osteosynthesis using cannulated headless Herbert screws in mandibular angle fracture treatment: A new approach?

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wallner ◽  
Knut Reinbacher ◽  
Matthias Feichtinger ◽  
Mauro Pau ◽  
Georg Feigl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture

scholarly journals A Prospective Study of Strut versus Miniplate for Fractures of Mandibular Angle

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Xue ◽  
John C. Koshy ◽  
Erik M. Wolfswinkel ◽  
William M. Weathers ◽  
Kristina P. Marsack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Angle Fracture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Comminuted Fractures ◽  
Angle Fractures ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
To Receive

This prospective randomized clinical trial compared the treatment outcomes of strut plate and Champy miniplate in fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Patients with mandibular angle fracture were consented and enrolled into this study. Exclusion criteria include patients with severely comminuted fractures. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the strut plate or Champy miniplate for angle fracture fixation. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the outcome. A total of 18 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to receive either the strut plate or Champy miniplate. Out of which five patients were excluded postoperatively due to complex fracture resulting in postoperative maxillomandibular fixation. The final enrollment was 13 patients, N = 6 (strut) and N = 7 (Champy). There was no statistically significant difference in the pretreatment variables. Nine of these patients had other associated facial fractures, including parasymphyseal and subcondylar fractures. Most of the (11) patients had sufficient follow-up after surgery. Both groups exhibited successful clinical unions of the mandibular angle fractures. The complications associated with the mandibular angle were 20% in the strut plate group and 16.7% in the Champy group. One patient in the strut plate group had a parasymphyseal infection, requiring hardware removal. The strut plate demonstrated comparable surgical outcome as the Champy miniplate. It is a safe and effective alternative for management of mandibular angle fracture.

Bilateral mandibular angle fracture: a rare entity

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla DOSIO ◽  
Matteo BRUCOLI ◽  
Paolo BOFFANO ◽  
Arnaldo BENECH
Keyword(s):  
Rare Entity ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture

scholarly journals Qualitative and quantitative assessment of relationship between mandibular third molar and angle fracture on North Indian population: A clinico-radiographic study

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Yadav ◽  
Shallu Tyagi ◽  
Naveen Puri ◽  
Prince Kumar ◽  
Puneet Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Indian Territory ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
The North ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fractures ◽  
Inferior Border ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar presence and the risk for mandibular angle fracture with the effect of various positions of mandibular third molar and the risk of mandibular angle fracture. Materials and Methods: In the North Indian territory, a total of 289 patients with mandibular angle fractures were studied and evaluated for the possible relationship with impacted third molar on the basis of clinical and panoramic radiographical findings. Results: Results that confirmed the highest risk for mandibular angle fracture was associated with mesioangular angulations (45.42%) followed by vertical (26.34%), distoangular in sequence and least risk was found with bucco-version angulations (2.67%) according to Winter′s classification. Additionally, the highest risk of mandibular angle fracture was reported with partially erupted third molar (47.75%), followed by erupted (23.53%) and unerupted third molar (19.38%). Conclusion: The risk for mandibular angle fracture is not only affected by status of eruption, angulations, position, number of roots present in third molar but also by the distance of mandibular third molar from inferior border of mandible and the percentage of remaining amount of bone at the mandibular angle region.

scholarly journals Transoral Miniplate Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture with and without 2 Weeks of Maxillomandibular Fixation: A Clinical Trial Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazem S. Khiabani ◽  
Meghdad Khanian Mehmandoost
Keyword(s):  
Facial Trauma ◽  
Mandibular Angle ◽  
Maxillomandibular Fixation ◽  
Mandibular Angle Fracture ◽  
Angle Fracture ◽  
Ideal Line ◽  
External Oblique ◽  
Angle Fractures ◽  
Sufficient Strength ◽  
Single Miniplate

Background and Objectives The ideal line of osteosynthesis in mandibular angle fractures indicates that a plate might be placed either along or just below the external oblique ridge. Some authors believe that using one miniplate at this line at the mandibular angle region provides sufficient strength to stabilize the fracture but others imply a second plate is required. Such controversies exist in the use of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). The intention of the present study was to compare efficiency and complications of using one miniplate with and without MMF in mandibular angle fractures. Methods and Materials Forty patients with facial trauma with mandibular angle fractures including displaced and unfavorable fractures were categorized into two groups of 20 persons. In all patients, one miniplate was placed on the external oblique ridge. In the first group, patients had light maxillomandibular elastic bands just after surgery but no rigid MMF. In the second group, patients had rigid MMF for 2 weeks after surgery. Patients were followed to evaluate complications and treatment efficiency. Conclusions Our study showed that use of a single miniplate in the external oblique ridge is a functionally stable treatment for all types of angle fractures (including displaced and unfavorable fractures) except comminuted and long oblique fractures, which were not included in our study. Use of postoperative MMF did not improve the results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document