scholarly journals Chromatin Ordering in the SV40 Virus

2011 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 402a
Author(s):  
Gadiel Saper ◽  
Stanislav Kler ◽  
Ariella Oppenheim ◽  
Uri Raviv ◽  
Daniel Harries
Keyword(s):  
1976 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 714-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Maul

SV40 particles can apparently enter the nucleus intact. However, they do not leave the nucleus despite the high concentration present during the productive phase. We found structural evidence that SV40 virus is prevented from approaching the most likely site of exit, the nuclear pore complex. From these images, it is concluded that the fibrils attached to the nuclear pore complex prevent egress of SV40 particles from the infected nucleus.


1977 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. G. Suarez ◽  
Ch. Lavialle ◽  
J. Stevenet ◽  
S. Estrade ◽  
A. G. Morris ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Milo ◽  
James R. Blakeslee ◽  
Ronald Hart ◽  
David S. Yohn

1985 ◽  
Vol 225 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Strain ◽  
W A H Wallace ◽  
A H Wyllie

Synchronized CV-1 cells were transfected with SV40 (simian virus 40) DNA-calcium phosphate co-precipitates. In the presence of carrier DNA, the transfection efficiency of SV40 DNA was decreased 5-fold in S-phase cells and was increased 4-fold in preparations of mitotically enriched cells as compared with asynchronous controls. No difference was observed when carrier DNA was omitted, when cells had progressed through S-phase and into G2-phase, or when the infectivity of cells to intact SV40 virus was tested. These results highlight the importance of cell-cycle-dependent factors on DNA-mediated gene transfer.


1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kriegler ◽  
M Botchan

We have constructed a recombinant simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA containing a copy of the Harvey murine sarcoma virus long terminal repeat (LTR). This recombinant viral DNA was converted into an infectious SV40 virus particle and subsequently infected into NIH 3T3 cells (either uninfected or previously infected with Moloney leukemia virus). We found that this hybrid virus, SVLTR1, transforms cells with 10 to 20 times the efficiency of SV40 wild type. Southern blot analysis of these transformed cell genomic DNAs revealed that simple integration of the viral DNA within the retrovirus LTR cannot account for the enhanced transformation of the recombinant virus. A restriction fragment derived from the SVLTR-1 virus which contains an intact LTR was readily identified in a majority of the transformed cell DNAs. These results suggest that the LTR fragment which contains the attachment sites and flanking sequences for the proviral DNA duplex may be insufficient by itself to facilitate correct retrovirus integration and that some other functional element of the LTR is responsible for the increased transformation potential of this virus. We have found that a complete copy of the Harvey murine sarcoma virus LTR linked to well-defined structural genes lacking their own promoters (SV40 early region, thymidine kinase, and G418 resistance) can be effectively used to promote marker gene expression. To determine which element of the LTR served to enhance the biological activity of the recombinant virus described above, we deleted DNA sequences essential for promoter activity within the LTR. SV40 virus stocks reconstructed with this mutated copy of the Harvey murine sarcoma virus LTR still transform mouse cells at an enhanced frequency. We speculate that when the LTR is placed more than 1.5 kilobases from the SV40 early promoter, the cis-acting enhancer element within the LTR can increase the ability of the SV40 promoter to effectively operate when integrated in a murine chromosome. These data are discussed in terms of the apparent cell specificity of viral enhancer elements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document