Targeting Chronic Recurrent Low Back Pain From the Top-down and the Bottom-up: A Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Intervention

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan M. Schabrun ◽  
Emma Jones ◽  
Edith L. Elgueta Cancino ◽  
Paul W. Hodges
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e38991211318
Author(s):  
Palloma Rodrigues de Andrade ◽  
Letícia Souza Martins ◽  
Heleod´ório Honorato dos Santos ◽  
Andreas Ries ◽  
Cícero da Rocha Souto ◽  
...  

Backgroud: Low back pain (LBP) has been associated with severe impairments, primarily related to activities of daily living, functional ability and quality of life. A multimodal approach to pain management, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), may improve outcomes in chronic LBP. However, the optimal cerebral target for stimulation still remains controversial. This pilot trial aims to investigate whether active stimulation could promote additional gains to the PES results in LBP patients. Our secondary objective is to investigate whether the stimulation of primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex results in distinct clinical effects for the patients involved. Methods: Sixty patients with chronic low back pain will be randomized into one of three tDCS groups associated with PES: motor primary cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and sham stimulation. Each group will receive transcranial direct current stimulation at an intensity of 2 mA for 30 minutes daily for 10 consecutive days. Patients will be assessed with a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short - Form Health Survey (SF-36) and electromyography at baseline, endpoint (after 10 sessions) and 1-month follow up. Discussion: This study will help to clarify the additive effects of tDCS combined with peripheral electrical stimulation on pain relief, muscle function and improvement in quality of life. Additionally, we will provide data to identify optimal targets for management of chronic low back pain.


2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (9) ◽  
pp. 1257-1270
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alwardat ◽  
Antonio Pisani ◽  
Mohammad Etoom ◽  
Roberta Carpenedo ◽  
Elisabetta Chinè ◽  
...  

Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1166-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Y Mariano ◽  
Frederick W Burgess ◽  
Marguerite Bowker ◽  
Jason Kirschner ◽  
Mascha van’t Wout-Frank ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Rezasoltani ◽  
Sirous Azizi ◽  
Sharif Najafi ◽  
Samaneh Sedighi ◽  
Maysam Elahi Movahed ◽  
...  

Introduction: Low back pain is recognized as a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Between 70 and 80% of adults experience at least one occasion of low back pain with duration of 3 months or longer in their lifetime. Aside from the classic treatment methods, there are other new techniques yet to be clinically investigated. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to alleviate pain by affecting the central nervous system. To date only a small number of studies have been published on the effects of tDCS on chronic low back pain. Some of these were pilot studies and others were low-powered in terms of their inference. Therefore the clinical application of tDCS requires further careful evaluation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Materials and methods: We carried out a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial in a University Hospital. In total 70 people (15 women) with low back pain were randomized to either active or sham stimulation. The primary outcome was intensity of low back pain on the Visual Analog Scale. We also used the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of back pain on daily activities. For the active stimulation group we administered 2 mA tDCS, 20 minutes for each session, once daily, 5 days per week for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. For the sham stimulation group a similar program was followed with no stimulation. Both groups used analgesic medication. Results: Within-group analysis showed that an initial decrease in pain intensity was significant in both groups (both p < 0.001). However, pain reduction became stable only in the active treatment group. There was a significant difference in the pattern of change in mean pain scores in favor of tDCS (p < 0.001). Active treatment also significantly reduced disability scores (all p values < 0.001), whereas participants in the sham treatment group did not experience functional recovery. Mixed ANOVA indicated that the pattern of change in mean scores of disability differed between the two groups throughout the study course, in favor of active stimulation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Transcranial direct current stimulation is an effective and safe initial treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain, and the benefits remain for at least several months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document