scholarly journals Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mona Masoudi ◽  
◽  
Sara Amiri ◽  
Nooshin Masoudian ◽  
Fatemeh Ehsani ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (9) ◽  
pp. 1257-1270
Author(s):  
Mohammad Alwardat ◽  
Antonio Pisani ◽  
Mohammad Etoom ◽  
Roberta Carpenedo ◽  
Elisabetta Chinè ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Gabriela Divino Soares Gioia ◽  
Caio de Almeida Lellis ◽  
Caio Reis Borges ◽  
Camila Puton ◽  
Giovanna Garcia de Oliveira ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chronic Low Back Pain is a condition associated with changes in different brain regions, related to pain, posture and emotions. Objectives: Review the current literature about the efficiency and safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the management of Chronic Low Back Pain. Design and setting: This is a systematic review of the literature conducted at the Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted in the PubMed, BVS and Lilacs databases, with the following research strategy: “(Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation or TDCS) and (Low Back Pain)”. Randomized studies, clinical trials and case reports published in the last 10 years were selected. Results: A clinical trial showed that TDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) for 20 minutes improved posture, balance and pain intensity of patients with CLBP. Also, a randomized clinical trial concluded that this technique, at 2-mA intensity, showed a significant reduction in CLBP. On the other hand, two randomized clinical trials showed that the results obtained did not support the application of the TDCS method for the treatment of CLBP, since the observed groups did not show considerable difference after stimulation. In addition, another double-blind controlled study also showed that TDCS over M1 did not influence the quality of patients’ CLBP. Conclusion: A conflict was noticed between the conclusions of the articles used to compose this review, that’s why more studies with scientific rigor are needed.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1166-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Y Mariano ◽  
Frederick W Burgess ◽  
Marguerite Bowker ◽  
Jason Kirschner ◽  
Mascha van’t Wout-Frank ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e38991211318
Author(s):  
Palloma Rodrigues de Andrade ◽  
Letícia Souza Martins ◽  
Heleod´ório Honorato dos Santos ◽  
Andreas Ries ◽  
Cícero da Rocha Souto ◽  
...  

Backgroud: Low back pain (LBP) has been associated with severe impairments, primarily related to activities of daily living, functional ability and quality of life. A multimodal approach to pain management, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and peripheral electrical stimulation (PES), may improve outcomes in chronic LBP. However, the optimal cerebral target for stimulation still remains controversial. This pilot trial aims to investigate whether active stimulation could promote additional gains to the PES results in LBP patients. Our secondary objective is to investigate whether the stimulation of primary motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex results in distinct clinical effects for the patients involved. Methods: Sixty patients with chronic low back pain will be randomized into one of three tDCS groups associated with PES: motor primary cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and sham stimulation. Each group will receive transcranial direct current stimulation at an intensity of 2 mA for 30 minutes daily for 10 consecutive days. Patients will be assessed with a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short - Form Health Survey (SF-36) and electromyography at baseline, endpoint (after 10 sessions) and 1-month follow up. Discussion: This study will help to clarify the additive effects of tDCS combined with peripheral electrical stimulation on pain relief, muscle function and improvement in quality of life. Additionally, we will provide data to identify optimal targets for management of chronic low back pain.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e013080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Louis Ouellette ◽  
Matthew B Liston ◽  
Wei-Ju Chang ◽  
David M Walton ◽  
Benedict Martin Wand ◽  
...  

IntroductionChronic low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly health problem yet current treatments demonstrate at best, small effects. The concurrent application of treatments with synergistic clinical and mechanistic effects may improve outcomes in chronic LBP. This pilot trial aims to (1) determine the feasibility, safety and perceived patient response to a combined transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and sensorimotor retraining intervention in chronic LBP and (2) provide data to support a sample size calculation for a fully powered trial should trends of effectiveness be present.Methods and analysisA pilot randomised, assessor and participant-blind, sham-controlled trial will be conducted. Eighty participants with chronic LBP will be randomly allocated to receive either (1) active tDCS + sensorimotor retraining or (2) sham tDCS + sensorimotor retraining. tDCS (active or sham) will be applied to the primary motor cortex for 20 min immediately prior to 60 min of supervised sensorimotor retraining twice per week for 10 weeks. Participants in both groups will complete home exercises three times per week. Feasibility, safety, pain, disability and pain system function will be assessed immediately before and after the 10-week intervention. Analysis of feasibility and safety will be performed using descriptive statistics. Statistical analyses will be conducted based on intention-to-treat and per protocol and will be used to determine trends for effectiveness.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been gained from the institutional human research ethics committee (H10184). Written informed consent will be provided by all participants. Results from this pilot study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberACTRN12616000624482


2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. S262-S263
Author(s):  
Timothy Mariano ◽  
Frederick Burgess ◽  
Marguerite Bowker ◽  
Jason Kirschner ◽  
Richard Jones ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Megan E. McPhee ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is often without clear underlying pathology. Affective disturbance and dysfunctional pain mechanisms, commonly observed in populations with CLBP, have, therefore, been suggested as potential contributors to CLBP development and maintenance. However, little consensus exists on how these features interact and if they can be targeted using non-invasive brain stimulation. In this pilot trial, 12 participants completed two phases (Active or Sham) of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the medial prefrontal cortex, applied for 20 min on three consecutive days. Clinical pain ratings, questionnaires, and sensitivity to painful cuff pressure were completed at baseline, then 4 trials of conditioned pain modulation (CPM; alone, with distraction using a Flanker task, with positive affect induction, and with negative affect induction using an image slideshow) were performed prior to HD-tDCS on Day 1 and Day 4 (24 h post-HD-tDCS). At baseline, attentional and affective manipulations were effective in inducing the desired state (p < 0.001) but did not significantly change the magnitude of CPM-effect. Active HD-tDCS was unable to significantly alter the magnitude of the shift in valence and arousal due to affective manipulations, nor did it alter the magnitude of CPM under any basal, attentional, or affective manipulation trial significantly on Day 4 compared to sham. The CPM-effect was greater across all manipulations on Day 1 than Day 4 (p < 0.02) but also showed poor reliability across days. Future work is needed to expand upon these findings and better understand how and if HD-tDCS can be used to enhance attentional and affective effects on pain modulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document