Women making waves Editorial: Impact of sex in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by instantaneous wave-free ratio

Author(s):  
Mirvat Alasnag ◽  
Stephane Manzo-Silberman
Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972199617
Author(s):  
Monica Verdoia ◽  
Rocco Gioscia ◽  
Matteo Nardin ◽  
Orazio Viola ◽  
Marta Francesca Brancati ◽  
...  

Aim: Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has emerged as the strategy of choice for the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. The impact of preprocedural β-blockers therapy on the iFR was the aim of this study. Methods: We included patients undergoing functional assessment of intermediate (40%-70%) coronary lesions in 2 centers. The iFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire and calculated at the core laboratory using the manufacturers’ dedicated software. Minimal luminal diameter, reference diameter, percent diameter stenosis, and length of the lesion were measured. Positive iFR was considered for values <0.90. Results: We included 197 patients undergoing functional evaluation of 223 coronary lesions. Patients on β-blockers (69%) had more frequently hypertension ( P = .05); previous myocardial infarction ( P = .01); therapy with clopidogrel ( P = .02), statins, and aspirin; and acute coronary syndrome at presentation ( P < .001, respectively). Mean iFR values were slightly higher in patients on β-blockers (0.94 ± 0.06 vs 0.92 ± 0.06, P = .11). The rate of positive iFR was significantly lower with β-blockers (14.9% vs 27.5%, P = .04). On multivariate analysis, β-blockers use was a predictor of the significance of coronary stenoses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.23-0.98; P = .05) together with lesion length (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.07; P = .007). Conclusion: Among patients undergoing iFR, preprocedural β-blockers are associated with higher absolute values and a lower rate of positive iFR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-835
Author(s):  
Martyna Zaleska ◽  
Łukasz Kołtowski ◽  
Jakub Maksym ◽  
Mariusz Tomaniak ◽  
Maksymilian Opolski ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Prashant Patel ◽  
Ravi Rao ◽  
Prabhdeep Sethi ◽  
Ashis Mukherjee ◽  
Padmini Varadarajan ◽  
...  

AbstractAngiography is inaccurate in assessing functional significance of coronary lesions, and often stenoses deemed severe on angiographic assessment do not restrict coronary blood flow at rest or with maximal dilatation. Angiography-guided revascularization has not shown improvement in hard clinical outcomes in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Most current guidelines for SIHD recommend invasive functional assessment of lesions to guide revascularization if prior evidence of ischemia is not available. There has been several recent advances and development of novel methods in this arena. Various contemporary clinical trials have been undertaken for validation of these indices. Here we review the physiological basis, tools, techniques, and evidence base for various invasive (resting as well as hyperemic) and noninvasive methods for functional assessment of coronary lesions. Left main stenosis, bifurcation lesions, serial stenosis, and acute coronary syndrome each causes unique disequilibrium that may affect measurements and require special considerations for accurate functional assessment.


Author(s):  
Monica Verdoia ◽  
Matteo Nardin ◽  
Orazio Viola ◽  
Marta Francesca Brancati ◽  
Pier Luigi Soldà ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document