Virtual (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve: Future Role in Acute Coronary Syndromes

The current management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is with an invasive strategy to guide treatment. However, identifying the lesions which are physiologically significant can be challenging. Non-invasive imaging is generally not appropriate or timely in the acute setting, so the decision is generally based upon visual assessment of the angiogram, supplemented in a small minority by invasive pressure wire studies using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or related indices. Whilst pressure wire usage is slowly increasing, it is not feasible in many vessels, patients and situations. Limited evidence for the use of FFR in non-ST elevation (NSTE) ACS suggests a 25% change in management, compared with traditional assessment, with a shift from more to less extensive revascularisation. Virtual (computed) FFR (vFFR), which uses a 3D model of the coronary arteries constructed from the invasive angiogram, and application of the physical laws of fluid flow, has the potential to be used more widely in this situation. It is less invasive, fast and can be integrated into catheter laboratory software. For severe lesions, or mild disease, it is probably not required, but it could improve the management of moderate disease in 'real time' for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), and in bystander disease in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Its practicability and impact in the acute setting need to be tested, but the underpinning science and potential benefits for rapid and streamlined decision-making are enticing.

A Comparison Between Pressure Wire and Microcatheter Measurements for Evaluating the Cerebral Venous Pressure Gradient

Introduction: A pressure gradient of over 8 mm Hg across the stenosis (usually located in the transverse-sigmoid junction) is one of the criteria for cerebral venous stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients. The possible inaccuracy of the traditional microcatheter-based pressure measurements has been discussed in previous studies. In the cardiology field, a dual-sensor pressure wire is routinely used for the evaluation of stenotic lesions. Using a pressure wire for cerebral vasculature was previously discussed in a small case series and case reports. In this study, we compared venous pressure measurements obtained using both a microcatheter and a pressure wire in patients who were candidates for stenting.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, comparing the two methods of pressure measurements in 26 patients with venous stenosis. Altogether, 120 measurements were performed using both methods. Demographic characteristics, medical history, procedural details, medications, indications for the procedure, and complications were collected from the patient charts.Results: Based on an 8-mm Hg pressure gradient cutoff indication, 19 patients were found eligible to go through unilateral venous stenting based on catheter measurements alone. The wire results corroborated the catheter results in detecting all cases indicated for a stent. This finding implies a sensitivity equal to 100% for the wire measurements. There were no wire-related complications, demonstrating its safety.Conclusions: We conclude that the pressure wire is as safe as the microcatheter and can identify cases requiring intervention. A larger-scale study is needed to assess the measurement accuracy of the pressure wire in brain vasculature.

Positive predictive value of CT coronary angiography vs. CT fractional flow reserve in a real-world population

Background Computerised tomography coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve (CTCA and CT-FFR) are non-invasive diagnostic tools for the detection of flow limiting coronary artery stenoses. Although their negative predictive values are well established, there is a concern that the high sensitivity of these tests may lead to overestimation of coronary artery disease (CAD) and unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA). We compared the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT-FFR with computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) against the gold standard of ICA in different real-world patient groups. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 477 patients referred for CTCA or CT-FFR for investigation of possible coronary ischaemia. Patients were excluded if the image quality was poor or inconclusive. Patient-based PPV was calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as more than 70% stenosis on ICA. A sub-analysis of PPV by indication for scan was also performed. Patients that underwent invasive non-hyperaemic pressure wire measurements had their iFR or RFR compared with their CT-FFR values. Results In a patient-based analysis, the overall PPV was 59.3% for CTCA and 76.2% for CT-FFR. This increased to 81.0% and 86.7% respectively for patients with stable angina symptoms. In patients with atypical angina symptoms, CT-FFR considerably outperformed CTCA with a PPV of 61.3% vs. 37.5%. There was not a linear relationship between invasive pressure wire measurement and CT-FFR value (r=0.23, p=0.265). Conclusion The PPV of CTCA and CT-FFR is lower in the real-world than in previously published trials, partly due to the heterogeneity of indication for the scan. However, in patients with typical angina symptoms, both are reliable diagnostic tools to determine the presence of clinically significant coronary stenoses. CT-FFR significantly outperforms CTCA in patients with more atypical symptoms and the targeted use of CT-FFR in this group may help to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Takotsubo Syndrome Assessed by Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance: A Pressure-Wire-Free Tool

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been proposed as a key mechanism in Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). The non-hyperaemic angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (NH-IMRangio) has been validated as a pressure-wire-free tool for the assessment of coronary microvasculature. We aimed to study the presence of CMD in TTS patients and its association with levels of cardiac biomarkers and systolic dysfunction patterns. Methods: We recruited 181 consecutive patients admitted for TTS who underwent cardiac angiography at a tertiary center from January 2014 to January 2021. CMD was defined as an NH-IMRangio ≥ 25. Plasma levels of NT-proBNP, high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography were measured at admission. Results: Mean age was 75.3 years, 83% were women and median LVEF was 45%. All patients presented CMD (NH-IMRangio ≥ 25) in at least one epicardial coronary artery. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) showed higher median NH-IMRangio values than left circumflex (LCx) and right coronary arteries (RCA) (44.6 vs. 31.3 vs. 36.1, respectively; p < 0.001). NH-IMRangio values differed among ventricular contractility patterns in the LAD and RCA (p = 0.0152 and 0.0189, respectively) with the highest values in the mid-ventricular + apical and mid-ventricular + basal patterns. NT-proBNP levels, but not high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), were correlated with both the degree and the extent of CMD in patients with TTS. Lower LVEF was also associated with higher NH-IMRangio values. Conclusions: CMD is highly prevalent in patients admitted for TTS and is associated with both a higher degree of systolic dysfunction and higher BNP levels, but not troponin.

A novel vessel fraction flow reserve three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based software. First case in Latin America

Fractional flow reserve has become the mainstay of functional hemodynamic assessment and is considered the gold standard to identify ischemic coronary stenoses. However, adopting the method into daily practice has been limited. Indeed, it requires the use of a costly pressure wire and the administration of a hyperemic agent. Vessel fractional flow reserve is a 3D-QCA based fractional flow reserve, using CAAS Workstation (version 8.4; Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, the Netherlands). It is a non-invasive method that does not require pressure wire or hyperemic agent; therefore it is time saving and easy to use. This is the first case performed in Brazil and demonstrates the correlation between fractional flow reserve and vessel fractional flow reserve performed in the same lesion, and the feasibility of calculation of vessel fractional flow reserve using 3D QCA-based software. We report the case of a 61-year-old male, who was admitted for typical chest pain. Coronary angiography revealed serial intermediate lesions in the mid- and distal left anterior descending. We evaluated left anterior descending lesions initially by fractional flow reserve then by vessel fractional flow reserve. Fractional flow reserve in distal left anterior descending was 0.65. Then, vessel fractional flow reserve value was calculated at 0.61. In our case, the correlation was adequate and the feasibility with offline calculation was excellent and fast. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of vessel fractional flow reserve performed in Latin America. Therefore, we expect vessel fractional flow reserve to be a game changer in management of coronary artery disease patients, particularly those with intermediate lesions.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With an Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Stratified by Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Aims: Despite the prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), its assessment with pressure-wire-based methods remains limited due to cost, technical and procedural complexities. The non-hyperaemic angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (NH IMRangio) has been shown to reliably predict microvascular injury in patients with STEMI. We investigated the prognostic potential of NH IMRangio as a pressure-wire and adenosine-free tool.Methods and Results: NH IMRangio was retrospectively derived on the infarct-related artery at completion of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in 262 prospectively recruited STEMI patients. Invasive pressure-wire-based assessment of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was performed. The combination of all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest and new heart failure was the primary endpoint. NH IMRangio showed good diagnostic performance in identifying CMD (IMR &gt; 40U); AUC 0.78 (95%CI: 0.72–0.84, p &lt; 0.0001) with an optimal cut-off at 43U. The primary endpoint occurred in 38 (16%) patients at a median follow-up of 4.2 (2.0–6.5) years. On survival analysis, NH IMRangio &gt; 43U (log-rank test, p &lt; 0.001) was equivalent to an IMR &gt; 40U(log-rank test, p = 0.02) in predicting the primary endpoint (hazard ratio comparison p = 0.91). NH IMRangio &gt; 43U was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (adjusted HR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.01–4.48, p = 0.047).Conclusion: NH IMRangio is prognostically equivalent to invasively measured IMR and can be a feasible alternative to IMR for risk stratification in patients presenting with STEMI.

Hemodynamic Versus Anatomic Assessment of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis: the Relationship Between Pressure Wire Translesional Gradient and Angiographic Lesion Geometry

Background: Intracranial cerebral atherosclerosis (ICAS) is a leading etiology of ischemic stroke. The diagnosis and assessment of intracranial stenosis are shifting from anatomic to hemodynamic for better risk stratification. However, the relationships between lesion geometry and translesional pressure gradient have not been clearly elucidated.Methods: Patients with symptomatic unifocal M1 middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) stenosis were consecutively recruited. The translesional pressure gradient was measured with a pressure wire and was recorded as both mean distal/proximal pressure ratios (Pd/Pa) and translesional pressure difference (Pa–Pd). Lesion geometry measured on angiography was recorded as diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, and lesion length. The correlations between pressure-derived and angiography-derived indices were then analyzed.Results: Forty-three patients were analyzed. A negative correlation was found between Pd/Pa and diameter stenosis (r = −0.371; p = 0.014) and between Pa – Pd and minimal lumen diameter (r = −0.507; p = 0.001). A positive correlation was found between Pd/Pa and minimal lumen diameter (r = 0.411; p = 0.006) and between Pa – Pd and diameter stenosis (r = 0.466; p = 0.002).Conclusions: In a highly selected ICAS subgroup, geometric indices derived from angiography correlate significantly with translesional pressure gradient indices. However, the correlation strength is weak-to-moderate, which implies that anatomic assessment could only partly reflect hemodynamic status. Translesional pressure gradient measured by pressure wire may serve as a more predictive marker of ICAS severity. More factors need to be identified in further studies.