scholarly journals Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halley M. Pontes ◽  
Mark D. Griffiths
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-82
Author(s):  
Asti Adwitiya ◽  
Supra Wimbarti

Adiksi video game menjadi perhatian para peneliti di dunia, ditandai munculnya adiksi video game dalam DSM 5 sebagai internet gaming disorder. Namun kebanyakan penelitian tersebut masih berfokus pada remaja meski saat ini, mayoritas anak-anak juga sudah bermain video game dengan berbagai tingkatan motivasi yang melatarbelakanginya. Orangtua sebagai pihak yang memfasilitasi anak dengan perangkat untuk bermain game perlu memediasi interaksi anak dengan game yang dimainkannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara motivasi bermain video game dan mediasi orangtua terhadap kecenderungan adiksi video game. Penelitian ini melibatkan 233 anak berusia 9-12 tahun (110 laki-laki ; 123 perempuan).. Analisis jalur yang dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa mediasi gatekeeping menjadi moderator hubungan antara motivasi bermain dengan kecenderungan adiksi video game.


2017 ◽  
Vol 174 (5) ◽  
pp. 486-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Wei Yao ◽  
Marc N. Potenza ◽  
Jin-Tao Zhang

Author(s):  
Chih-Hung Ko ◽  
Sue-Huei Chen ◽  
Chih-Hung Wang ◽  
Wen-Xiang Tsai ◽  
Ju-Yu Yen

Objectives: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) includes the diagnostic criteria for Internet gaming disorder (IGD). This study evaluated (1) the screening, diagnostic, and prevalence-estimated cutoff points of the Chen Internet Addiction Scale–Gaming Version (CIAS-G) for IGD in the DSM-5; and (2) the differences in the CIAS-G and subscale scores among individuals with IGD, regular gamers (RGs), and other control subjects. Methods: We recruited 69 participants with IGD, 69 RGs, and 69 healthy participants based on diagnostic interviews conducted by a psychiatrist according to DSM-5 IGD criteria. All participants completed the CIAS-G and were assessed using the clinical global impression scale. Results: The optimal screening and diagnostic cutoff points were 68 or more (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 76.8%) and 72 or more (sensitivity, 85.5%; specificity, 87.0%) for IGD based on DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The 76 or more cutoff point had the highest number needed to misdiagnose and was the optimal prevalence estimated cutoff point. Conclusions: The screening cutoff point could be used to identify individuals with IGD for further diagnostic interviewing to confirm the diagnosis in the clinical setting or for two-stage epidemiological evaluation. The diagnostic cutoff point provides a provisional diagnosis of IGD when diagnostic interviewing is unavailable. The prevalence-estimated cutoff point could be used to estimate the prevalence of IGD in large-scale epidemiological investigations when further diagnostic interviewing is impractical. The clinical and epidemiological utility of CIAS-G warrants further study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Király ◽  
Pawel Sleczka ◽  
Halley M. Pontes ◽  
Róbert Urbán ◽  
Mark D. Griffiths ◽  
...  

Addiction ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (7) ◽  
pp. 1186-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Petry ◽  
Charles P. O'Brien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document