Unfulfilled postpartum sterilization intent before and after introduction of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception

Contraception ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
RH Cohen ◽  
J Sheeder
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (12) ◽  
pp. 891-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Dhalla ◽  
M. M. Mamdani ◽  
M. L.A. Sivilotti ◽  
A. Kopp ◽  
O. Qureshi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Jari Heiskanen ◽  
Juha Hartikainen ◽  
Janne Martikainen ◽  
Heikki Miettinen ◽  
Mikko Hippeläinen ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims We studied the purchases of medical therapy recommended for coronary artery disease patients before and after elective revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary bypass grafting (CABG)). Methods All patients who underwent an elective PCI (N = 1557) or CABG (N = 1768) at the Heart Center, Kuopio University hospital between 2007 and 2014 were included. Data were collected from the hospital’s coronary register and national registers, and obtained for 3 years before and 1 year after the revascularisation. Results Altogether 85.2% of PCI patients and 88.1% of CABG patients had purchased lipid-modifying agents before the procedure, and 94.9% and 96.8% during the post-procedure follow-up year, respectively. Beta-blocking agents were purchased by 84.9% of PCI patients before and by 87.9% after the procedure and by 86.3% of CABG patients before and 97.1% after the operation. Of PCI patients, 64.3% had purchased organic long-acting nitrates before the procedure and 54.4% also after the procedure. Among CABG patients, the purchase of organic long-acting nitrates fell from 59.7% before to 10.1% after the operation. The use of ADP receptor blocking agents increased in PCI patients (26.3 to 83.9%) and the use of warfarin in CABG patients (9.4 to 21.3%). Medication purchases were more common among those who had greater use of hospital services before and after the procedures. Conclusions In both PCI and CABG patients, the use of medical therapy before and after revascularisation procedure complied with current guidelines. Purchases of long-acting nitrates were common in the PCI group even after the procedure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (03) ◽  
pp. 170-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Thiem ◽  
Here Folkerts ◽  
Lukas Völkel

Abstract Aim This research aims to compare the efficacy and direct costs of short-acting oral antipsychotics and aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) in the context of the treatment of patients with schizophrenia based on real-world data in Germany. Method Results are based on a single-armed, retrospective, non-interventional pre-post comparison study evaluating data from 132 patients with schizophrenia before and after switching from oral antipsychotics to AOM treatment (6 months each). Socio-demographics, as well as parameters of indication, efficacy and resource consumption were analyzed and statistically evaluated. Results The switch from an oral antipsychotic medication to AOM led to a distinct improvement in all clinically relevant parameters, including a reduction in hospitalization rates (55.1 % vs. 14.0 %), length of stay (43.5 d vs. 34.8 d) and percentage of patients with multiple hospitalizations (13.6 % vs. 3.8 %). There was also a reduction in schizophrenic episodes for patients with ≥ 1 episode (2.9 vs. 1.4) and of the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 (88.0 % vs. 29.3 %) as well as ≥ 2 (60.0 % vs. 8.1 %) schizophrenic episodes. The proportion of patients requiring a visit to day clinics or psychiatric institute outpatient clinics (PIA) decreased (39.5 % vs. 8.4 %) for patients with AOM treatment, as did the average length of stay in day clinics or PIAs (116.8 d vs. 86.4 d) for patients with ≥ 1 stay. The cost saving potential of AOM compared to the treatment with oral antipsychotics ranged between 1,729.32 € and 5,048.53 € per patient for a six-month observation period. Conclusion Our results suggest that AOM treatment of patients with schizophrenia is more effective (reduction in schizophrenic episodes, hospitalizations, stays in day clinics, psychiatrist visits, losses in productivity) and generates lower costs for the statutory health insurance (SHI) in Germany than treatment with oral antipsychotics and should therefore not be regarded as only a last-resort treatment option for schizophrenia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1616-1623 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Patel ◽  
E. Chesney ◽  
M. Taylor ◽  
D. Taylor ◽  
P. McGuire

AbstractBackgroundPaliperidone palmitate is one of the most widely prescribed long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in the UK. However, it is relatively expensive and there are few data comparing its effectiveness to that of other LAI antipsychotics. We sought to address this issue by analyzing a large anonymized electronic health record (EHR) dataset from patients treated with LAI antipsychotics.MethodsEHR data were obtained from 1281 patients in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) who started treatment with a LAI antipsychotic between 1 April 2011 and 31 January 2015. The number of days spent as a psychiatric inpatient and the number of admissions to a psychiatric hospital were analyzed in each of the 3 years before and after LAI prescription.ResultsPatients treated with paliperidone palmitate (n = 430; 33.6%) had a greater number of inpatient days and a greater number of admissions in the year prior to treatment than those treated with other LAI antipsychotics. Nevertheless, in the 3 years after initiation there were no significant differences between paliperidone and the other LAI antipsychotics in the number of days as an inpatient (B coefficient 5.4 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) −57.3 to 68.2, p = 0.86) or number of hospital admissions (Incidence rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.83, p = 0.82).ConclusionPaliperidone palmitate was more likely to be prescribed in patients with more frequent and lengthy hospital admissions prior to initiation. However, the absence of differences in outcomes after initiation indicates that paliperidone palmitate was not more effective than other cheaper LAI antipsychotics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 204512532092478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Pappa ◽  
Katy Mason

Background: Previous studies showed a linear correlation between partial compliance with an oral antipsychotic medication and hospitalisation risk among patients with schizophrenia. Long-acting injections (LAIs) may significantly improve adherence and reduce relapse in patients with psychosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the level of compliance with 1-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) and hospitalisation rates. Methods: This was a naturalistic, mirror-image study examining retention, compliance and hospitalisation rates 3 years pre- and 3 years post-PP1M initiation. Compliance was divided in three groups: full (no missed dose/year), good (6–11injections/year), poor (<6 injections/year). Results: A total of 173 patients suffering from a severe mental illness (70% with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 30% with other diagnoses) were included; 77% of patients continued PP1M for 1 year, 66% for 2 years and 55% for 3 years. Of the 95 patients who remained on PP1 throughout the 3 years of follow up, 81% showed full, 13% good, and only 6% poor compliance. In the patients who were fully compliant, the mean number of hospital admissions decreased from 1.34 to 0.43, and the mean number of bed days from 82 to 19 days per patient 3 years before and 3 years after PP1M initiation ( p < 0.001). It is noteworthy that the reductions in hospital stay were statistically significant for the group of patients with full compliance but not for the other two groups. In fact, patients with poor compliance demonstrated higher hospitalisation rates both before and after PPM1 initiation. These findings were similar in the subgroup of patients with schizophrenia who continued treatment for 3 years ( n = 68). Conclusion: There was a direct association between partial compliance and re-hospitalisation; fully compliant patients maintained the best outcomes in terms of reduced bed use following PPM1 initiation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Zappi ◽  
Pingfang Song ◽  
Siriana Nicosia ◽  
Francesco Nicosia ◽  
Kai Rehder

Background Muscle relaxants affect nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. Interaction of muscle relaxants with muscarinic receptors of human airways has been studied incompletely. Methods The effects of pipecuronium bromide (long-acting, nondepolarizing) and rocuronium bromide (intermediate-acting, nondepolarizing) on prejunctional and postjunctional muscarinic receptors were studied in 96 isolated human bronchial rings from 12 patients. Contractile isometric responses to electric field stimulation of pilocarpine-stimulated and nonstimulated M2 muscarinic receptors were compared before and after incubation with the two muscle relaxants. The effect on postjunctional muscarinic receptors was studied by comparing acetylcholine concentration-response curves before and after incubation with the two muscle relaxants. Results Pipecuronium bromide, but not rocuronium bromide, inhibited pilocarpine-stimulated prejunctional M2 muscarinic receptors. Neither pipecuronium bromide nor rocuronium bromide had significant inhibitory effects on nonstimulated M2 muscarinic receptors and on postjunctional M3 muscarinic receptors. Conclusions The inhibitory effect of pipecuronium bromide on pilocarpine-stimulated prejunctional M2 muscarinic receptors occurred at clinical concentrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document