Are young trees suitable for climate-growth analysis? A trial with Pinus nigra in the central Apennines treeline

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 125720
Author(s):  
Enrico Tonelli ◽  
Alessandro Vitali ◽  
Alma Piermattei ◽  
Carlo Urbinati
2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alma Piermattei ◽  
Francesco Renzaglia ◽  
Carlo Urbinati

2016 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alma Piermattei ◽  
Emanuele Lingua ◽  
Carlo Urbinati ◽  
Matteo Garbarino

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Giulio Tesei ◽  
Marina Allegrezza ◽  
Sandro Ballelli ◽  
Giampiero Ciaschetti ◽  
Carlo Console ◽  
...  

This paper represents the first syntaxonomic study on the Pinus nigra subsp. nigra artificial stands in the Apennines. It refers exclusively to the mature Pinus nigra forest plantations in the central Apennines that were planted before the 1950s, and then not managed. The mature Pinus nigra forest plantations in the central Apennines are distributed within four National Parks, on limestone substrata, mainly with southern aspects and rugged slopes, and at elevations ranging from 655 m to 1670 m a.s.l.. Two new phytosociological associations are described here and classified in the alliance Junipero communis–Pinion nigrae: Orthilio secundae–Pinetum nigrae and Digitalidi micranthae–Pinetum nigrae. The association Orthilio secundae–Pinetum nigrae comprises the relative mesophilous mature pine forests of the supratemperate thermotype in the plant landscape context of the alliance Aremonio agrimonioidis–Fagion sylvaticae potential vegetation belt. The Digitalidi micranthae–Pinetum nigrae comprises the thermophilous pine forests occurring on rocky stands within mesotemperate and lower supratemperate thermotypes in the potential belt of alliance Carpinion orientalis woods. The comparison of these two new associations and the phytosociological literature concerning the natural communities of Pinus nigra in the Apennines highlights their floristic and coenological autonomy.


2019 ◽  
pp. 108-126
Author(s):  
Ivan L. Lyubimov

This paper examines the evolution of academic and applied approaches to analyze the problem of economic growth since the mid-XX century. For quite an extended period of time, these views were corresponding to universalist economic policies taking no adequate account of particularities and limitations that a certain catching-up economy embodied. New approaches analyzing the problems of economic growth, on the contrary, individualize growth diagnostics, structural transformation and the organization of reforms processes for the emerging economies. We argue that individualist approaches might be potentially more effective than the universalist ones for solving the problem of slow economic growth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document