A prospective multicentre open label study to assess effect of Teneligliptin on glycemic control through parameters of time in range (TIR) Metric using continuous glucose monitoring (TOP-TIR study)

Author(s):  
Bansi Saboo ◽  
Suhas Erande ◽  
A.G. Unnikrishnan
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpana Rayannavar ◽  
Lauren M. Mitteer ◽  
Courtney A. Balliro ◽  
Firas H. El-Khatib ◽  
Katherine L. Lord ◽  
...  

<i>Objective:</i> To determine if the bihormonal bionic pancreas (BHBP) improves glycemic control and reduces hypoglycemia in individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) and post-pancreatectomy diabetes (PPD) compared with usual care (UC). <p><i>Methods</i>: Ten subjects with HI and PPD completed this open-label, crossover pilot study. Co-primary outcomes were mean glucose concentration and time with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose concentration <3.3 mmol/L.</p> <p><i>Results</i>: Mean (SD) CGM glucose concentration was 8.3 mmol/L (0.7) in the BHBP period vs. 9 mmol/L (1.8) in the UC period (p=0.13). Mean (SD) time with CGM glucose concentration <3.3 mmol/L was 0% (0.002) in the BHBP period vs. 1.3% (0.018) in the UC period (p=0.11). </p> <p><i>Conclusion</i>: Relative to UC, the BHBP resulted in comparable glycemic control in our population. </p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpana Rayannavar ◽  
Lauren M. Mitteer ◽  
Courtney A. Balliro ◽  
Firas H. El-Khatib ◽  
Katherine L. Lord ◽  
...  

<i>Objective:</i> To determine if the bihormonal bionic pancreas (BHBP) improves glycemic control and reduces hypoglycemia in individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) and post-pancreatectomy diabetes (PPD) compared with usual care (UC). <p><i>Methods</i>: Ten subjects with HI and PPD completed this open-label, crossover pilot study. Co-primary outcomes were mean glucose concentration and time with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose concentration <3.3 mmol/L.</p> <p><i>Results</i>: Mean (SD) CGM glucose concentration was 8.3 mmol/L (0.7) in the BHBP period vs. 9 mmol/L (1.8) in the UC period (p=0.13). Mean (SD) time with CGM glucose concentration <3.3 mmol/L was 0% (0.002) in the BHBP period vs. 1.3% (0.018) in the UC period (p=0.11). </p> <p><i>Conclusion</i>: Relative to UC, the BHBP resulted in comparable glycemic control in our population. </p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin L Gal ◽  
Nathan J Cohen ◽  
Davida Kruger ◽  
Roy W Beck ◽  
Richard M Bergenstal ◽  
...  

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of initiating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) through telehealth as a means of expanding access. Adults with type 1 diabetes (N = 27) or type 2 diabetes using insulin (N = 7) and interest in starting CGM selected a CGM system (Dexcom G6 or Abbott FreeStyle Libre), which they received by mail. CGM was initiated with a certified diabetes care and education specialist providing instruction via videoconference or phone. The primary outcome was days per week of CGM use during the last 4 weeks. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at baseline and 12 weeks. Participant self-reported outcome measures were also evaluated. All 34 participants (mean age, 46 ± 18 years; 53% female, 85% white) were using CGM at 12 weeks, with 94% using CGM at least 6 days per week during weeks 9 to 12. Mean HbA1c decreased from 8.3 ± 1.6 at baseline to 7.2 ± 1.3 at 12 weeks (P &lt; .001) and mean time in range (70-180 mg/dL, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) increased from an estimated 48% ± 18% to 59% ± 20% (P &lt; .001), an increase of approximately 2.7 hours/day. Substantial benefits of CGM to quality of life were observed, with reduced diabetes distress, increased satisfaction with glucose monitoring, and fewer perceived technology barriers to management. Remote CGM initiation was successful in achieving sustained use and improving glycemic control after 12 weeks as well as improving quality-of-life indicators. If widely implemented, this telehealth approach could substantially increase the adoption of CGM and potentially improve glycemic control for people with diabetes using insulin.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1254-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Miura ◽  
Kazuhiko Sakaguchi ◽  
Yuko Okada ◽  
Tomoko Yamada ◽  
Natsu Otowa‐Suematsu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela R. Kushner ◽  
Davida F. Kruger

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides comprehensive assessment of daily glucose measurements for patients with diabetes and can reveal high and low blood glucose values that may occur even when a patient’s A1C is adequately controlled. Among the measures captured by CGM, the percentage of time in the target glycemic range, or “time in range,” (typically 70–180 mg/dL) has emerged as one of the strongest indicators of good glycemic control. This review examines the shift to using CGM to assess glycemic control and guide diabetes treatment decisions, with a focus on time in range as the key metric of glycemic control.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela R. Kushner ◽  
Davida F. Kruger

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides comprehensive assessment of daily glucose measurements for patients with diabetes and can reveal high and low blood glucose values that may occur even when a patient’s A1C is adequately controlled. Among the measures captured by CGM, the percentage of time in the target glycemic range, or “time in range,” (typically 70–180 mg/dL) has emerged as one of the strongest indicators of good glycemic control. This review examines the shift to using CGM to assess glycemic control and guide diabetes treatment decisions, with a focus on time in range as the key metric of glycemic control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document