P0163 Free thin anterolateral thigh flap versus free radial forearm reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: A functional assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. e31
Author(s):  
Qingang Hu ◽  
Mingxing Lu ◽  
Zhiyong Wang ◽  
Xudong Yang ◽  
Guowen Sun ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Maltzaris ◽  
Maria Kotrotsiou ◽  
Spyridon Stavrianos

Abstract Aim The purpose of this presentation is to review our experience and evaluate our results in the treatment of patients with pharyngoesophageal fistula after laryngectomy and radiotherapy. Background & Methods 10 patients were examined at the head and neck combined oncology clinic after previous laryngectomy and radiotherapy and pharyngocutaneous fistula with weakness to feed food as well frequent aspiration pneumonia. The interval between the effect of the laryngectomy varies between 3-5 years depending on the severity of the symptomatology and after the complete failure of the conservative methods of reconstruction. Reconstruction was performed with musculocutaneous major pectoral flap in 8 patients, radial forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap. Results The postoperative period was uncomplicated, and in all patients the feeding was held after barium swallow test, after 7-15 days with soft food. The gold standard treatment of pharyngoesophageal fistula after laryngectomy and radiotherapy is the musculocutaneous major pectoral flap and in severe radionecrosis of the neck with free tissue flap reconstruction. Conclusion Reconstruction with microsurgical techniques offer improved prognosis and quality of life of our patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad M. Teven ◽  
Jason W. Yu ◽  
Lee C. Zhao ◽  
Jamie P. Levine

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is a versatile fasciocutaneous flap that has been used successfully in the reconstruction of defects across the body. In specific cases, it may prove superior to more commonly used options (e.g., anterolateral thigh flap and radial forearm free flap). Historically, a disadvantage of the MSAP flap is the relatively small surface area it provides for reconstruction. We recently encountered a patient with extensive pelvic injuries from prior trauma resulting in significant scarring and contracture of the groin, tethering of the penis, and loss of the scrotum and one testicle. The patient was unable to achieve erection from tethering and his remaining testicle had been buried in the thigh. In considering the reconstructive options, he was not a suitable candidate for a thigh-based or forearmbased flap. An extended MSAP flap measuring 25 cm×10 cm was used for resurfacing of the groin and pelvis as well as for the formation of a neoscrotum. This report is the first to document an MSAP flap utilized for simultaneous groin resurfacing and scrotoplasty. Additionally, the dimensions of this flap make it the largest recorded MSAP flap to date.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document