Comparison of multi-institutional pre-treatment verification for VMAT of nasopharynx with delivery errors

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M. Pogson ◽  
S. Arumugam ◽  
C.R. Hansen ◽  
M. Currie ◽  
S.J. Blake ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. S48-S49
Author(s):  
I. Kolkman-Deurloo ◽  
L. Heerden van ◽  
R. Paassen van ◽  
J. Schiphof-Godart ◽  
M. Christianen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilda van Zijtveld ◽  
Maarten L.P. Dirkx ◽  
Hans C.J. de Boer ◽  
Ben J.M. Heijmen

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1348-S1350
Author(s):  
J.D. García Fuentes ◽  
P. Retorta ◽  
R. Colmenares ◽  
D. Sevillano ◽  
F. Orozco ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 191-192
Author(s):  
C. Talamonti ◽  
A. Bartoli ◽  
M. Scaringella ◽  
A. Baldi ◽  
L. Masi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thahabah Alharthi ◽  
Elise M. Pogson ◽  
Sankar Arumugam ◽  
Lois Holloway ◽  
David Thwaites

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part25) ◽  
pp. 3520-3520
Author(s):  
S Vikraman ◽  
D Manigandan ◽  
M Ramu ◽  
Kp Karrthick ◽  
T Rajesh ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalee Kim ◽  
Hong In Yoon ◽  
Jin Sung Kim ◽  
Woong Sub Koom ◽  
Jee Suk Chang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite detailed instruction for full bladder, patients are unable to maintain consistent bladder filling during a 5-week pelvic radiation therapy (RT) course. We investigated the best bladder volume estimation procedure for verifying consistent bladder volume. Methods We reviewed 462 patients who underwent pelvic RT. Biofeedback using a bladder scanner was conducted before simulation and during treatment. Exact bladder volume was calculated by bladder inner wall contour based on CT images (Vctsim). Bladder volume was estimated either by bladder scanner (Vscan) or anatomical features from the presacral promontory to the bladder base and dome in the sagittal plane of CT (Vratio). The feasibility of Vratio was validated using daily megavoltage or kV cone-beam CT before treatment. Results Mean Vctsim was 335.6 ± 147.5 cc. Despite a positive correlation between Vctsim and Vscan (R2 = 0.278) and between Vctsim and Vratio (R2 = 0.424), Vratio yielded more consistent results than Vscan, with a mean percentage error of 26.3 (SD 19.6, p < 0.001). The correlation between Vratio and Vctsim was stronger than that between Vscan and Vctsim (Z-score: − 7.782, p < 0.001). An accuracy of Vratio was consistent in megavoltage or kV cone-beam CT during treatment. In a representative case, we can dichotomize for clinical scenarios with or without bowel displacement, using a ratio of 0.8 resulting in significant changes in bowel volume exposed to low radiation doses. Conclusions Bladder volume estimation using personalized anatomical features based on pre-treatment verification CT images was useful and more accurate than physician-dependent bladder scanners. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document