scholarly journals Explainable models of credit losses

Author(s):  
João A. Bastos ◽  
Sara M. Matos
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-378
Author(s):  
T.B. Kuvaldina ◽  
◽  
E.V. Lobachev ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett W. Cantrell ◽  
John M. McInnis ◽  
Christopher G. Yust
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-262
Author(s):  
Tobias Filusch ◽  
Sascha H. Mölls
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungMit dem „(Lifetime) Expected Credit Loss“ hat der internationale Standardsetzer einen prospektiven Wertminderungsmaßstab für Finanzinstrumente entwickelt. Mit Blick auf die dadurch induzierte Stärkung des Gläubigerschutzes sowie eine mögliche Angleichung des deutschen HGB an die Vorgaben der IFRS sollten sich Banken und Versicherungen im genossenschaftlichen Umfeld ebenso wie Prüfungsverbände frühzeitig ein Bild von den anstehenden Änderungen machen.


Author(s):  
Jeffery D. Amato ◽  
Eli M. Remolona
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 908-924
Author(s):  
Sara Jonsson

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the design of loan officer reward systems affects bank credit losses caused by commercial clients. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses an agent-based model to investigate how the design of reward systems affects bank credit losses. Two different systems are compared: competitive and a cooperative. The model is designed according to the theoretically derived assumption that a cooperative reward system will make agents more likely to share knowledge with each other in the processes of granting and monitoring credit. Findings – The results show that a cooperative reward system have potential to reduce bank credit losses. The reduction of errors in evaluating company’s probability of default thus mitigates variations induced by variations in industry, region, and firm-specific returns. Practical implications – The findings imply that reward system design should be considered in credit risk management. Further, managerial issues (e.g. reward systems) should be considered in risk modeling. Originality/value – The results presented in this paper provide evidence to the value of considering the downside (e.g. loss) when designing reward systems in banks.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hrvoje Volarević ◽  
Mario Varović

This article explores and analyzes the implementation problem of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9) which is in use from 1 January 2018. IFRS 9 is most relevant for financial institutions, but also for all business subjects with a significant share of financial assets in their Balance sheet. The main objective of this article is the implementation of new impairment model for financial instruments, which is measurable through Expected Credit Losses (ECL). The use of this model is in correlation with a credit risk of the company for which it is necessary to determine basic variables of the model: Exposure at Default (EAD), Loss Given Default (LGD) and Probability of Default (PD). Basel legislation could be used for LGD calculation while PD calculation is based on specific methodology with two different solutions. In the first option, PD is taken as an external data from reliable rating agencies. When there is no external rating, an internal model for PD calculation has to be created. In order to develop an internal model, authors of this article propose application of multi-criteria decision-making model based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Input data in the model are based on information from financial statements while MS Excel is used for calculation of such multi-criteria problem. Results of internal model are mathematically related with PD values for each analyzed company. Simple implementation of this internal model is an advantage compared to other much more complicated models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document