Breakpoint determination when multiple organisms are tested for effect targets

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 196-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.L. Drusano ◽  
Arnold Louie
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Gamerdinger ◽  
Kristin Bosse ◽  
Thomas Eggermann ◽  
Vera Kalscheuer ◽  
Gesa Schwanitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryan N. Douglas ◽  
Hua Yang ◽  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Fangpu Han ◽  
...  

AbstractThe B chromosome of maize undergoes nondisjunction at the second pollen mitosis as part of its accumulation mechanism. Previous work identified 9-Bic-1 (9-B inactivated centromere-1), which comprises an epigenetically silenced B chromosome centromere that was translocated to the short arm of chromosome 9(9S). This chromosome is stable in isolation, but when normal B chromosomes are added to the genotype, it will attempt to undergo nondisjunction during the second pollen mitosis and usually fractures the chromosome in 9S. These broken chromosomes allow a test of whether the inactive centromere is reactivated or whether a de novo centromere is formed elsewhere on the chromosome to allow recovery of fragments. Breakpoint determination on the B chromosome and chromosome 9 showed that mini chromosome B1104 has the same breakpoint as 9-Bic-1 in the B centromere region and includes a portion of 9S. CENH3 binding was found on the B centromere region and on 9S, suggesting both centromere reactivation and de novo centromere formation. Another mini chromosome, B496, showed evidence of rearrangement, but it also only showed evidence for a de novo centromere. Other mini chromosome fragments recovered were directly derived from the B chromosome with breakpoints concentrated near the centromeric knob region, which suggests that the B chromosome is broken at a low frequency due to the failure of the sister chromatids to separate at the second pollen mitosis. Our results indicate that both reactivation and de novo centromere formation could occur on fragments derived from the progenitor possessing an inactive centromere.


2010 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Resta ◽  
Roberto Giorda ◽  
Rosanna Bagnulo ◽  
Silvana Beri ◽  
Erika Della Mina ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 5875-5882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lepak ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Daniel Diekema ◽  
Michael Pfaller ◽  
David Andes

ABSTRACTEchinocandins are a preferred therapy for invasive candidiasis due to their potency and broad spectrum. Resistance, especially inCandida glabrata, is an emerging threat to their use. Pharmacodynamic (PD) studies examining reduced susceptibility secondary tofksmutations inC. glabrataare lacking. The current study explored PD targets for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin in anin vivoinvasive candidiasis model against 11C. glabrataisolates with known or putativefksmutations. The PD targets were compared to those of 8 wild-type (WT) isolates. The MIC ranges in the WT group were 0.03 to 0.25 mg/liter for anidulafungin, 0.03 to 0.25 mg/liter for caspofungin, and 0.01 to 0.06 mg/liter for micafungin. The MIC ranges for mutants were 0.06 to 4, 0.25 to 16, and 0.13 to 8 mg/liter for the same compounds, respectively. The mean free drug 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUCf)/MIC ratio associated with a stasis endpoint for the WT group was 13.2 for anidulafungin, 2.04 for caspofungin, and 6.78 for micafungin. Comparative values for mutants were 3.43, 2.67, and 0.90, respectively. Pharmacokinetic data from patients suggest that theC. glabrataPD targets needed for success in this model could be achieved based on MIC values of 0.25 mg/liter for anidulafungin, 2 mg/liter for caspofungin, and 0.5 mg/liter for micafungin. These values are higher than recently identified epidemiology cutoff values (ECVs). The results suggest that drug-specific MIC breakpoints could be increased for caspofungin and micafungin againstC. glabrataand could include organisms with mutations infks-1andfks-2. While identification of genetic mutants is epidemiologically important, the phenotype (MIC) provides a better predictor of therapeutic efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document