Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET, combined FDG-PET/CT and EUS in diagnosing primary pancreatic carcinoma: A meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Tang ◽  
Gang Huang ◽  
Jianjun Liu ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Lyndal Treven ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 958-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Mahmood ◽  
Ayse Tuba Kendi ◽  
Saira Farid ◽  
Saira Ajmal ◽  
Geoffrey B. Johnson ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0194435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongxi Wang ◽  
Guohua Shen ◽  
Chong Jiang ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Futao Cui ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1082-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongyong Zhu ◽  
Yanfang Wang ◽  
Lisha Wang ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Sama Byanju ◽  
...  

Background 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial. Purpose To investigate the prognostic role of pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET on SCLC patients by meta-analysis. Material and Methods Extensive literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify literature published until 5 May 2017. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed to assess their correlations with the pre-treatment maximum SUV (SUVmax). Either the fixed- or the random-effects model was adopted, depending on the heterogeneity observed across the studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results Twelve studies with 1062 patients were included. The pooled HR for OS of 11 studies was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05–1.22; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%) and the pooled HR for EFS of nine studies was 1.09 (95% CI = 1.02–1.17; P = 0.014; I2 = 0%), indicating that patients with high SUVs may have poorer prognoses. Begg’s test detected no significant publication bias. The prognostic role of the SUVmax remained similar in the subgroup analyses. Conclusion Our meta-analysis indicated that the pre-treatment SUVmax of primary lesions can be an important prognostic factor for OS and EFS in patients with SCLC. A high SUVmax may indicate poorer prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document