Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric lymphoma infiltrating bone marrow: a meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Xianwen Hu ◽  
Dandan Li ◽  
Guomei Hu ◽  
Qi Huang ◽  
Pan Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Lixin Sun ◽  
Bingye Zhang ◽  
Ruchen Peng

Objective. We sought to perform a systemic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (computed tomography) (PET(CT)) in detection of bone and/or bone marrow involvement (BMI) in pediatric neuroblastoma (NB). Materials and Methods. We searched electronic databases Pubmed and Embase to retrieve relevant references. We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC). Moreover, a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and likelihood ratio dot plot were plotted. Study-between statistical heterogeneity was evaluated via I-square index (I2). Subgroup analyses were used to explore heterogeneity. Results. Seven studies including 127 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.65–0.96) with heterogeneity I2 = 88.1% ( p < 0.001 ) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.67–1.00) with heterogeneity I2 = 77.8% ( p < 0.001 ), respectively. The pooled LR+, LR−, and DOR were 21.3 (95% CI: 2.1–213.9), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.05–0.40), and 157 (95% CI: 16–1532), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.98). Conclusions. Through a meta-analysis, this study suggested that 18F-FDG PET(CT) has a good overall diagnostic accuracy in the detection of bone/BMI in pediatric neuroblastoma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e35-e36
Author(s):  
Frédéric Lecouvet ◽  
Dimitar Boyadzhiev ◽  
Laurence Collette ◽  
Maude Berckmans ◽  
Nicolas Michoux ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianwen Hu ◽  
Dandan Li ◽  
Zhigang Liang ◽  
Yan Liao ◽  
Ling Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To compare the value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors. Materials and methods English articles reporting on the diagnostic performance of MRI or 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors published in PubMed and Embase between January 2000 and January 2021 were included in the meta-analysis. Two authors independently extracted the data. If the data presented in the study report could be used to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table comparing 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, the studies were selected for the analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Forest plots were generated according to the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI. Results A total of 27 articles, including 1118F-FDG PET/CT studies and 17 MRI studies on the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87–0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79–0.91), respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for MRI were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.95) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79–0.89), respectively. Conclusion While MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT both showed to have high and similar diagnostic performance in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors, MRI, a promising non-radiation imaging technology, may be a more suitable choice for patients with ovarian or accessory tumors. Nonetheless, prospective studies directly comparing MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors are needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1287-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Mariarosa Pascale ◽  
Elena Lazzeri ◽  
Wouter van der Bruggen ◽  
Roberto C. Delgado Bolton ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lian-Ming Wu ◽  
Fang-Yuan Chen ◽  
Xiao-Xing Jiang ◽  
Hai-Yan Gu ◽  
Yan Yin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Domenico Albano ◽  
Francesco Dondi ◽  
Maria Gazzilli ◽  
Raffaele Giubbini ◽  
Francesco Bertagna

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1927-1937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric E. Lecouvet ◽  
Dimitar Boyadzhiev ◽  
Laurence Collette ◽  
Maude Berckmans ◽  
Nicolas Michoux ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 716-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Kan ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jigang Yang ◽  
Zhenchang Wang

Background Fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO) are challenging medical problems. Previous studies have shown that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) plays an important role in the diagnosis of FUO, but few studies have explored this diagnostic technique in relation to IUO. Purpose To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published data on the diagnostic performance of PET/CT in the diagnosis of FUO and IUO. Material and Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines published in March 2018. Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance was performed using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratification based on study design, number of patients, geographic area, and final diagnosis based on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Meta-regression analyses were performed to recognize heterogeneity. Results Our meta-analysis included 23 studies, comprising a total sample size of 1927 patients. The pooled diagnosis performance was calculated with a per-patient-based analysis: sensitivity = 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.89), specificity = 0.63 (95% CI = 0.49–0.75), positive likelihood ratio = 2.3 (95% CI = 1.5–3.4), negative likelihood ratio = 0.25 (95% CI = 0.16–0.38), diagnostic odds ratio = 9 (95% CI = 4.0–20), and AUC = 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81–0.87). Conclusion In patients with non-specific symptoms and signs, 18F-FDG PET/CT is very helpful for recognizing and excluding diseases, directing further diagnostic decisions, and avoiding unnecessary invasive examinations. We recommend that 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered among the first-line diagnostic tools for patients with FUO and IUO.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document