Orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion with lower extraction and anchorage with mini implants: Case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo de Lima ◽  
Fernanda Brum ◽  
Maurício Mezomo ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pasquali ◽  
Marcel Farret
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Mini Implants

scholarly journals Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion : A Case Report

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-23
Author(s):  
SN Rita ◽  
SMA Sadat ◽  
MZ Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Anterior Open Bite

Reported case of a 19 years old male, with Class III malocclusion, bilateral cross bite associated with anterior open bite, which was treated by fixed orthodontic treatment. After treatment there was a class I Molar and incisor relation as well as the open bite was corrected with accepted aesthetic and functional satisfaction of the patient. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v1i1.15974 Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, October 2010; Vol-1, No.1, 22-23

scholarly journals Compensatory orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Valladares Neto
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Orthodontic Movement ◽  
Main Complaint ◽  
Clinical Stability

INTRODUCTION: This case report describes the orthodontic treatment of an adult patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite. A short cranial base led to difficulties in establishing a cephalometric diagnosis. The patient's main complaint comprised esthetics of his smile and difficulties in mastication. METHODS: The patient did not have the maxillary first premolars and refused orthognathic surgery. Therefore, the treatment chosen was orthodontic camouflage and extraction of mandibular first premolars. For maxillary retraction, the vertical dimension was temporarily increased to avoid obstacles to orthodontic movement. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment, ideal overjet and overbite were achieved. CONCLUSION: Examination eight years after orthodontic treatment revealed adequate clinical stability. This case report was submitted to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics (BBO) as part of the requirements to become a BBO diplomate.

Traumatically Induced Maxillary Retrusion—A Case Report of Orthodontic Management with the Protraction Headgear

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
P. A. Banks ◽  
W. H. P. Bogues
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Surgical Reduction ◽  
Traumatic Episode ◽  
Removable Orthodontic Appliances

A 46-year-old male Caucasian with traumatically induced maxillary retrusion was referred for orthodontic treatment, eight weeks after the original fracture had occurred. Initial surgical reduction and fixation had been successful, when a second traumatic episode was encountered. This resulted in a further degree of posterior maxillary displacement, which was resistant to further surgical reduction. The resulting Class III malocclusion was treated using maxillary protraction headgear, in conjunction with removable orthodontic appliances and intermaxillary traction. Appliances were worn full time and inter-arch correction was achieved in six months. The resulting occlusion proved to be stable following the cessation of active treatment.

scholarly journals Minimizing the compensatory effects of the Class III malocclusion orthodontic treatment with Biofunctional preadjusted prescription – Case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e57110917934
Author(s):  
Wilton Souza Rêgo Netto ◽  
Raquel Amarante ◽  
Roberto Grec ◽  
Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira ◽  
Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Facial Appearance ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Incisors ◽  
Mandibular Incisors

Introduction: Class III malocclusion has skeletal and dental components that can often impair the patient's facial appearance. Its treatment may involve orthognathic surgery or compensatory orthodontics. Case report: This case report presents a Class III malocclusion compensatory orthodontic treatment performed with the Biofunctional prescription brackets. Biofunctional prescription presents a torque value of 0° for the maxillary incisors and +10° for the mandibular incisors, which counteracts to the side effects of the use of Class III intermaxillary elastics, minimizing it, providing a more stable, aesthetic and with a healthier periodontal occlusion. Conclusion: The Class III malocclusion compensatory orthodontic treatment performed with Biofunctional prescription obtains satisfactory results, even depending on the patient collaboration with the use of intermaxillary elastics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document