Corrigendum to:“The scale invariance criterion for geophysical fluids” [Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 74 (2019) 92–98]

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 147-149
Author(s):  
Urs Schaefer-Rolffs
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urs Schaefer-Rolffs

<p>Scale invariance of geophysical fluids is investigated in terms of a scale invariance criterion. It was developed by Schaefer-Rolffs et al. (2015) based on the implication that each scale invariant subrange shall have its own criterion. Two particular cases are considered, namely the synoptic scales with a significant Coriolis term and a case at smaller scales where the anelastic approximation is valid. The first case is characterized by a constant enstrophy cascade, while in the second case small-scale fluctuations of density, pressure, and temperature are taken into account. In both cases, the respective scale invariance criteria are applied to simple parameterizations of turbulent diffusion. It is demonstrated that only dynamic approaches are scale invariant.</p>


Methodology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Martínez ◽  
Manuel Ruiz Marín

The aim of this study is to improve measurement in marketing research by constructing a new, simple, nonparametric, consistent, and powerful test to study scale invariance. The test is called D-test. D-test is constructed using symbolic dynamics and symbolic entropy as a measure of the difference between the response patterns which comes from two measurement scales. We also give a standard asymptotic distribution of our statistic. Given that the test is based on entropy measures, it avoids smoothed nonparametric estimation. We applied D-test to a real marketing research to study if scale invariance holds when measuring service quality in a sports service. We considered a free-scale as a reference scale and then we compared it with three widely used rating scales: Likert-type scale from 1 to 5 and from 1 to 7, and semantic-differential scale from −3 to +3. Scale invariance holds for the two latter scales. This test overcomes the shortcomings of other procedures for analyzing scale invariance; and it provides researchers a tool to decide the appropriate rating scale to study specific marketing problems, and how the results of prior studies can be questioned.


1984 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-346
Author(s):  
D.G. Andrews
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Skouri ◽  
J. Marignan ◽  
J. Appell ◽  
G. Porte

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document