scholarly journals The Role of Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Results from the Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
Nicolaas Lumen ◽  
Elise De Bleser ◽  
Sarah Buelens ◽  
Wesley Verla ◽  
Filip Poelaert ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise De Bleser ◽  
Nicolaas Lumen ◽  
Sarah Buelens ◽  
Wesley Verla ◽  
Wietse Claeys ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Tilki ◽  
Christopher P Evans

Oncologic outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are poor, with overall survival in the range of 44 to 60 months. The treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed mPCa is changing. Previous retrospective studies reported a survival benefit for local treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) in addition to androgen deprivation treatment in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer. Several randomized clinical trials are now evaluating integration of local treatment in the approach to mPCa. The aim of this review is to summarize the studies reporting local treatment in men with mPCa at diagnosis. This review contains 1 table and 27 references.  Key Words: cytoreductive prostatectomy, hormone-naive, local treatment, metastatic prostate cancer, oligometastatic, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, randomized


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Zhiqiang Qin ◽  
Yamin Wang ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Yichun Wang ◽  
...  

The recommended therapy by EAU guidelines for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without chemotherapy. The role of radical prostatectomy (RP) in the treatment of mPCa is still controversial. Hence, a meta-analysis was conducted by comprehensively searching the databases PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for the relevant studies published before September 1st, 2017. Our results successfully shed light on the relationship that RP for mPCa was associated with decreased cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (pooled HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.36–0.47) and enhanced overall survival (OS) (pooled HR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.44–0.55). Subsequent stratified analysis demonstrated that no matter how RP compared with no local therapy (NLT) or radiation therapy (RT), it was linked to a lower CSM (pooled HR = 0.36, 95%CI = 0.30–0.43 and pooled HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.43–0.73, respectively) and a higher OS (pooled HR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.44–0.56 and pooled HR = 0.46, 95%CI 0.33–0.65, separately). When comparing different levels of Gleason score, M-stage or N-stage, our results indicated that high level of Gleason score, M-stage or N-stage was associated with increased CSM. In summary, the outcomes of the present meta-analysis demonstrated that RP for mPCa was correlated with decreased CSM and enhanced OS in eligible patients of involved studies. In addition, patients with less aggressive tumors and good general health seemed to benefit the most. Moreover, no matter compared with NLT or RT, RP showed significant superiority in OS or CSM. Upcoming prospective randomized controlled trials were warranted to provide more high-quality data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Metcalfe ◽  
Marc C. Smaldone ◽  
Daniel W. Lin ◽  
Ana M. Aparicio ◽  
Brian F. Chapin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document