Do student social background and school context affect implementation of a school-based physical activity program?

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 101844
Author(s):  
Julie Dalgaard Guldager ◽  
Jesper von Seelen ◽  
Pernille Tanggaard Andersen ◽  
Anja Leppin
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerli Mooses ◽  
Triin Vihalemm ◽  
Marko Uibu ◽  
Katrin Mägi ◽  
Leene Korp ◽  
...  

Abstract This article focuses on the process of designing the vital, participatory school-based intervention program aiming to increase the physical activity in schools. The program analyzed is Estonian nationwide comprehensive physical activity program Schools in Motion (SiM) that recently received European Commission’s #BeActive Education Award. The program has a good performance in terms of willingness of schools to participate in co-creation of program development, the high interest to join the program and zero dropouts, and strong partnership with ministries which enables to actively participate in policy making. Authors analyze the key elements of the planning, piloting, implementation, and scaling phases of the SiM program and share their lessons learnt in co-working with schools. The difficulties faced during the development process, the strengths and challenges associated with an interdisciplinary approach, and involvement of schools as experts have been addressed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerli Mooses ◽  
Triin Vihalemm ◽  
Marko Uibu ◽  
Katrin Mägi ◽  
Leene Korp ◽  
...  

AbstractThis article focuses on the process of designing the vital, participatory school-based intervention program aiming to increase the physical activity in schools. The program analyzed is Estonian nationwide comprehensive physical activity program Schools in Motion (SiM) that recently received European Commission’s #BeActive Education Award. The program has a good performance in terms of willingness of schools to participate in co-creation of program development, the high interest to join the program and zero dropouts, and strong partnership with ministries which enables to actively participate in policy making. Authors analyze the key elements of the planning, piloting, implementation, and scaling phases of the SiM program and share their lessons learnt in co-working with schools. The difficulties faced during the development process, the strengths and challenges associated with an interdisciplinary approach, and involvement of schools as experts have been addressed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document