scholarly journals A comparison of heterosexual and homosexual mating preferences in personal advertisements

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie F. Lawson ◽  
Christine James ◽  
Anna-Ulla C. Jannson ◽  
Nicola F. Koyama ◽  
Russell A. Hill
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark N. Hatala ◽  
Jennifer M. Walker ◽  
James Harrington ◽  
Lauren Rich ◽  
Eneda Hoxha

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 911-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne R.K. Zajitschek ◽  
Jonathan P. Evans ◽  
Robert Brooks

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
pp. 9282-9294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Moran ◽  
Muchu Zhou ◽  
Julian M. Catchen ◽  
Rebecca C. Fuller

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-423
Author(s):  
Júlio Césae Melo Poderoso ◽  
José Cola Zanuncio ◽  
Anderson Puker ◽  
Francisco De Souza Ramalho ◽  
Carlos Frederico Wilcken ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Carol Miller ◽  
Anila Putcha-Bhagavatula ◽  
William C. Pedersen

Have men and women evolved sex-distinct mating preferences for short-term and long-term mating, as postulated by some evolutionary theorists? Direct tests of assumptions, consideration of confounds with gender, and examination of the same variables for both sexes suggest men and women are remarkably similar. Furthermore, cross-species comparisons indicate that humans do not evidence mating mechanisms indicative of short-term mating (e.g., large female sexual skins, large testicles). Understanding human variability in mating preferences is apt to involve more detailed knowledge of the links between these preferences and biological and chemical mechanisms associated with sexual motivation, sexual arousal, and sexual functioning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document