scholarly journals Growing stock monitoring by European National Forest Inventories: Historical origins, current methods and harmonisation

2022 ◽  
Vol 505 ◽  
pp. 119868
Author(s):  
Thomas Gschwantner ◽  
Iciar Alberdi ◽  
Sébastien Bauwens ◽  
Susann Bender ◽  
Dragan Borota ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stein M. Tomter ◽  
Patrizia Gasparini ◽  
Thomas Gschwantner ◽  
Petra Hennig ◽  
Gintaras Kulbokas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Atkinson ◽  
David M. Edwards ◽  
Frank Søndergaard Jensen ◽  
Alexander P. N. van der Jagt ◽  
Ben R. Ditchburn ◽  
...  

Abstract Key message National Forest Inventories (NFIs) hold promise for monitoring and valuing of non-productive forest functions, including social and recreational services. European countries use a range of methods to collect social and recreational information within their NFI methodologies. Data collected frequently included general and recreation-specific infrastructure, but innovative approaches are also used to monitor recreational use and social abuse. Context Social and recreational indicators are increasingly valued in efforts to measure the non-productive value of forests in Europe. National Forest Inventories (NFIs) can be used to estimate recreational and social usage of forest land at a national level and relate this use to other biophysical, spatial and topographical features. Nonetheless, there is little information concerning the extent. Aims The study aims to identify the coverage of social and recreational data present in European NFIs including the types of data recorded as part of the NFI methodologies across European countries. It also aims to examine contrasting methods used to record social and recreational data and present recommendations for ways forward for countries to integrate these into NFI practice. Methods A pan-European questionnaire was designed and distributed to 35 counties as part of the EU-funded project Distributed, Integrated and Harmonised Forest Information for Bioeconomy Outlooks (DIABOLO). The questionnaire probed countries on all social and recreational data that was included within NFIs. Qualitative response data was analysed and recoded to measure the extent of social and recreational data recoded in European NFIs both as a function of the number of variable categories per country and the number of countries recording particular variables. Results Thirty-one countries reported at least one social or recreational variable over 12 categories of data. The most frequently recorded variables included ownership, general transport infrastructure and recreation-specific infrastructure. Countries collecting data over many different categories included Switzerland, Great Britain, Czech Republic, Luxemburg and Denmark. Conclusion The study proposes a specific set of indicators, based upon countries with well-developed social and recreational data in their NFIs, which could be used by other countries, and report on the extent to which these are currently collected across Europe. It discusses results and makes a series of recommendations concerning priorities for the inclusion of social and recreational data in European NFIs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 274-285
Author(s):  
K. Tessa Hegetschweiler ◽  
Christoph Fischer ◽  
Marco Moretti ◽  
Marcel Hunziker

Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kangas ◽  
Räty ◽  
Korhonen ◽  
Vauhkonen ◽  
Packalen

Forest information is needed at global, national and local scales. This review aimed at providing insights of potential of national forest inventories (NFIs) as well as challenges they have to cater to those needs. Within NFIs, the authors address the methodological challenges introduced by the multitude of scales the forest data are needed, and the challenges in acknowledging the errors due to the measurements and models in addition to sampling errors. Between NFIs, the challenges related to the different harmonization tasks were reviewed. While a design-based approach is often considered more attractive than a model-based approach as it is guaranteed to provide unbiased results, the model-based approach is needed for downscaling the information to smaller scales and acknowledging the measurement and model errors. However, while a model-based inference is possible in small areas, the unknown random effects introduce biased estimators. The NFIs need to cater for the national information requirements and maintain the existing time series, while at the same time providing comparable information across the countries. In upscaling the NFI information to continental and global information needs, representative samples across the area are of utmost importance. Without representative data, the model-based approaches enable provision of forest information with unknown and indeterminable biases. Both design-based and model-based approaches need to be applied to cater to all information needs. This must be accomplished in a comprehensive way In particular, a need to have standardized quality requirements has been identified, acknowledging the possibility for bias and its implications, for all data used in policy making.


2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 807-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gschwantner ◽  
Adrian Lanz ◽  
Claude Vidal ◽  
Michal Bosela ◽  
Lucio Di Cosmo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Vidal ◽  
Iciar Alberdi ◽  
John Redmond ◽  
Martin Vestman ◽  
Adrian Lanz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Portier ◽  
Jan Wunder ◽  
Golo Stadelmann ◽  
Jürgen Zell ◽  
Meinrad Abegg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document