Postsurgical Alar Retraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wee Tin K. Kao ◽  
Richard E. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Juliano de Oliveira Sales ◽  
Wolfgang Gubisch ◽  
Rodrigo Ribeiro Ferreira Duarte ◽  
Aline Souza Costa Teixeira Moreno ◽  
Felipe Marques de Oliveira ◽  
...  

AbstractHere we describe a new technique to deal with alar retraction, a highly undesirable imperfection of the nose. The procedure involves placing a caudal extension graft below the vestibular portion of the lower lateral cartilage (LLC) after its detachment from the vestibular skin. The graft is fixed to the cartilage and, subsequently, to the vestibular tissue. The present retrospective study included 20 patients, 11 females and 9 males, with a mean age of 28.90 years. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 18 months. Surgery improved alar notching to a smoother dome shape and nostril exposure was reduced in every patient. The caudal extension graft of the LLC contributed to rise in overall patient satisfaction, as revealed by the postoperative increase of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) mean score from 40.0 to 79.17 (p < 0.0001). It also contributed to and improved functional outcomes, as indicated by the decrease of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) mean score from 52.75 to 13.25 (p = 0.0001). Sex did not affect the mean ROE and NOSE scores. Thus, increased patient satisfaction measured by the ROE is present in both sexes and at both age groups but it is better detected in the first year after surgery. Functional improvements analyzed with NOSE are best detected in patients aged ≥ 30 years and in follow-ups of 11 months. The caudal extension graft of the LLC technique described herein effectively and safely corrects alar retraction and the collapse of the nasal valve while filling the soft triangle.


2009 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 1088-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hak Jung ◽  
Edward S. Kwak ◽  
Han Sung Kim

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 564-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Jun Jang ◽  
Sung Min Kim ◽  
Dae Hyun Lew ◽  
Seung Yong Song

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 283e-291e
Author(s):  
A. Samandar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Mark B. Constantian ◽  
April Deng ◽  
Gary Fudem

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Cole

Examination of rhinomanometric records of 2500 referred adult patients revealed 891 unobstructed noses (Rn <0.25 Pa/cm3/sec). Topical decongestant reduced respiratory airflow resistances of these noses by ⅓ on average indicating the extent of the vascular component. Alar retraction, which minimizes resistance of the compliant portion of the nose, reduced unilateral nasal resistances by as much as ⅔, establishing the alar lumen as a major resistive segment of the unobstructed nasal airway. The nasal resistances that persisted after decongestion and alar retraction predominated in the immediately adjacent cavum. There remained 1350 noses designated as obstructed by clinician assessment of the records and suitable for analysis. Application of topical decongestant, which minimized the mucovascular component of resistance, revealed ⅘ of residual obstructions to be principally unilateral and were designated as structural. Half these structural obstructions were restricted to the alar lumen and half included the alar lumen and the adjoining cavum. Obstructions confined to the cavum were less than 2%. A further ⅕ of the nasal obstructions were bilateral and their resistances, which were markedly elevated in many cases, were substantially reduced by topical decongestant indicating an extensive vascular component. They were designated as mucosal.


2008 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 288e-296e ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald P. Gruber ◽  
Gil Kryger ◽  
David Chang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Viresh Arora ◽  
Faisal Ashfaq ◽  
Atif Rafique

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Composite defects of nose and cheek are best stage reconstructed with separate nose and cheek flaps to recreate a blended nose-cheek junction, achieved by cheek advancement flap for cheek and forehead flap or local grafts for the nasal defect. This article analyses whether reconstruction of defects utilizing well-known subunit principle is cosmetically the best?</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Case records of fifteen patients of nasal cancers extension into the cheek from January 2011 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Out of fifteen patients 8 were men and 7 women, two patients had SCC, rest had BCC. Average size of defect was 4.5 cm. Modified Imre’s cheek advancement flaps was used in all to reconstruct cheek defects while paramedian forehead flap was used for nasal reconstruction in 13 patients, skin graft and nasal advancement flap in one each. Eight patients underwent single stage reconstruction while seven with full thickness nasal defects had a delayed reconstruction. 13 patients rated their final appearance as satisfactory, while surgeon rated 12 patients with well-blended nose-cheek junction as satisfactory and lateral migration of junction being unsatisfactory. Alar retraction was observed in two patients with full thickness nasal defects. Two patients who underwent inner nasal lining reconstruction developed wound dehiscence while simultaneous reconstruction of nose and cheek was performed.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Subunit principle application for composite nose and cheek results in symmetrical nose-cheek junction and appears excellent technique in achieving a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Optimal results in full thickness nasal defects are achieved where reconstructing is delayed.</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Priya Tiwari ◽  
Priya Tiwari ◽  
Ong Wei Chen ◽  
TC Lim ◽  
Lim Jane

Introduction: The Oriental nose differs from the Caucasian nose in terms of size, subunit definition, texture, and thickness of the skin [1]. Zitelli’s bilobed flap enables aesthetic reconstruction in Caucasian noses but in smaller Oriental noses the outcomes are less desirable with nasal alar retraction commonly seen [2]. Hence, we describe a modification of Zitelli’s bilobed flap incorporating nasolabial skin for a single stage nasal reconstruction with reduced nasal alar retraction [3]. Methods: We modified the bilobed flap based on Zitelli’s bilobed flap and the aesthetic subunit principle, as modified for Orientals by Yotsuyanagi in 2000 [4]. The primary lobe was located between the defect and the cheek and the second lobe was located on the cheek, above the nasolabial fold. The modification of the bilobed flap was designed to have a primary lobe that was 10% longer than the length of the distal defect edge from the flap’s pivot point, and the width of the primary lobe was equal to the width of the defect. The length of the secondary lobe was 130% of the length of the distal defect edge to the flap’s pivot point, and the width of the secondary lobe was two-thirds the width of the primary lobe. Results: Satisfactory alar reconstruction was achieved from the viewpoint of the patient and surgeon. There was good nasal contour and appropriate symmetry of the nasal tip with reduced nasal alar retraction. Conclusion: The modification of Zitelli’s bilobed flap to have a longer primary lobe and include nasolabial skin, results in reduced nasal alar retraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document