scholarly journals “Performing Developability:” Generating threat and value in private land conservation

Geoforum ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Kelly Kay
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Pavlacky ◽  
Christian A. Hagen ◽  
Anne M. Bartuszevige ◽  
Rich Iovanna ◽  
T. Luke George ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A Williamson ◽  
Brett G. Dickson ◽  
Mevin B. Hooten ◽  
Rose A. Graves ◽  
Mark N. Lubell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1930-1939 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Yeiser ◽  
John J. Morgan ◽  
Danna L. Baxley ◽  
Richard B. Chandler ◽  
James A. Martin

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Farmer ◽  
Jacob C. Brenner ◽  
Michael Drescher ◽  
Stephanie L. Dickinson ◽  
Eric G. Knackmuhs

Oryx ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Downsborough ◽  
Charlie M. Shackleton ◽  
Andrew T. Knight

AbstractSpatial prioritizations and gap analyses are increasingly undertaken to allocate conservation resources. Most spatial prioritizations are conducted without specifying the conservation instruments to be implemented and gap analyses typically assess formally protected areas but increasingly include private land conservation instruments. We examine conservancies to see if these voluntary instruments contribute towards achieving goals of South African conservation planning initiatives. We conducted a nationwide survey and interviews with conservancy members in Gauteng and the Eastern Cape. Conservancies have potential for assisting South Africa to achieve conservation planning goals at national and local scales but their inclusion in spatial prioritizations and gap analyses predicates improved protection for nature, operational refinement and increased support. We sound a warning to conservation planning initiatives that incorporate voluntary instruments on private land, and present recommendations for strengthening such instruments to make them more effective. Our findings may assist conservation planners elsewhere to design more effective conservation planning initiatives focused on private land.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1182-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMREI VON HASE ◽  
MATHIEU ROUGET ◽  
RICHARD M. COWLING

Author(s):  
Verónica Etchebarne Palla ◽  
Magdalena Carabio ◽  
Mariana Ríos ◽  
Gustavo Garibotto ◽  
Gonzalo Cortés Capano

AMBIO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1019-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Gooden ◽  
Michael ‘t Sas-Rolfes

Abstract In recent years, private land conservation has increased in profile among policymakers and academics. Conservation initiatives on privately owned land help to mitigate global biodiversity loss and introduce new actors to conservation. However, they have also been the subject of numerous critical accounts. This review catalogs issues that emerge in critical literature, identifying 25 themes, classified into three groups: Implementation Effectiveness, Value Conflict, and Economic Inefficiency. Gaps in the literature include the need for broader geographic coverage; assessment of the issues’ specificity to private land conservation; and evaluation of the extent to which issues in the literature reflect broader societal values. The literature’s strong emphasis on value conflict suggests that greater attention to governance effectiveness may steer private land conservation toward practices that are more just, equitable, and representative and lead to increased societal support. We recommend further research to address identified gaps, with a greater orientation toward inclusive governance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document