Split-dose sodium picosulfate–magnesium citrate colonoscopy preparation achieves lower residual gastric volume with higher cleansing effectiveness than a previous-day regimen

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
César Prieto-Frías ◽  
Miguel Muñoz-Navas ◽  
María Teresa Betés ◽  
Ramón Angós ◽  
Susana De la Riva ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB318
Author(s):  
CéSar Prieto ◽  
RAMóN AngóS ◽  
María Teresa BetéS ◽  
Susana De La Riva ◽  
Iago RodríGuez Lago ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 449-457
Author(s):  
Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto ◽  
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura ◽  
Kelly E Hathorn ◽  
Francisco Tustumi ◽  
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-145
Author(s):  
Masanori Tsuruoka

The author presents an improved method of preparation for colonoscopy that involved no dietary limitation on the patient until the day of the examination and that was shown by a randomized questionnaire evaluation to earn good patient tolerance and acceptance. Patients were given 10 mg of cisapride and 75 mg of sodium picosulfate before sleep on the day preceding the examination, and 50 g of magnesium citrate powder (MP) in 1,200 mL lukewarm water before the examination. It was divided into 600-mL portions and ingested slowly during two 30-minute periods. Ninety-five percent of patients classified the taste of a magnesium citrate powder laxative as palatable in the questionnaire given immediately after the procedure. Concerning the quantity, 79.4% replied that it was tolerable, 17.3% considered it somewhat excessive, and 3.3% replied that it was barely tolerable. No patient classified it as intolerable. Symptoms after taking laxatives and lukewarm water such as abdominal pain, nausea and abdominal fullness were observed in 3.8%, 4.4% and 5.6%, respectively, whereas there were no symptoms in 79% of patients. Body weight and serum K level showed a tendency to decrease, whereas the serum Mg level showed an increase before and after colonoscopy. The quality of colonic cleansing evaluated by colonoscopy was excellent, good, or fair in a total of 93.3%. No adverse effects were observed. It was concluded that this method is a clinically beneficial and well-tolerated preparation for colonic examinations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Hwan Song ◽  
Wu Seok Suh ◽  
Jin Sik Jeong ◽  
Dong Sik Kim ◽  
Sang Woo Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chen-Ta Yang ◽  
Hsuan-Yuan Huang ◽  
Hsu-Heng Yen ◽  
Chia-Wei Yang ◽  
Yang-Yuan Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document