ID: 3520970 DIAGNOSTIC POTENTIAL OF EUS-ELASTOGRAPHY AS PATHOLOGICAL OR FUNCTIONAL IMAGING FOR PANCREATIC CANCER

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB246-AB247
Author(s):  
Eizaburo Ohno ◽  
Hiroki Kawashima ◽  
Takuya Ishikawa ◽  
Tadashi Iida ◽  
Hirotaka Suzuki ◽  
...  
Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Yasutaka Ishii ◽  
Masahiro Serikawa ◽  
Tomofumi Tsuboi ◽  
Ryota Kawamura ◽  
Ken Tsushima ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among all cancers, and early diagnosis is essential for improving the prognosis. Along with radiologic modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic modalities play an important role in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This review evaluates the roles of two of those modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS can detect pancreatic cancer with higher sensitivity and has excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. EUS may be useful for the surveillance of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are also useful for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration shows excellent sensitivity and specificity, even for small pancreatic cancer, and is an essential examination method for the definitive pathological diagnosis and treatment decision strategy. On the other hand, ERCP is invasive and performed less frequently for the purpose of diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, ERCP is essential in cases that require evaluation of pancreatic duct stricture that may be early pancreatic cancer or those that require differentiation from focal autoimmune pancreatitis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. AB370
Author(s):  
Fumihide Itokawa ◽  
Takao Itoi ◽  
Atsushi Sofuni ◽  
Takayoshi Tsuchiya ◽  
Toshio Kurihara ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 573-575
Author(s):  
DI Gheonea ◽  
CT Streba ◽  
T Cârţână ◽  
A Săftoiu

2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Iglesias-Garcia ◽  
Jose Larino-Noia ◽  
Ihab Abdulkader ◽  
Jeronimo Forteza ◽  
Enrique Dominguez-Munoz

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 222-222
Author(s):  
Asish Patel ◽  
Sukhwinder Kaur ◽  
Lynette Smith ◽  
Chandrakanth Are ◽  
Surinder Batra

222 Background: Pancreatic juice remains an underutilized resource for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Mucins are high molecular weight glycoproteins differentially upregulated in pancreatic cancer, and we hypothesize that their profile in pancreatic juice may have diagnostic potential. Methods: Pancreatic juice was obtained during endoscopy from non-healthy non-pancreatic control (NHPC, n = 57), chronic pancreatitis (CP, n = 23), and pancreatic cancer (PC, n = 23) patients. Sandwich ELISA was used to detect MUC1, MUC4, MUC5AC, CA125, and CA19-9. Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test for group and pairwise comparison was done with p < 0.05 as significant. Logistic regression with ROC curve modeling of log transformed data was done for each biomarker individually and in combination to determine odds ratio (OR), sensitivity (SN), and specificity (SP) for PC. Results: PC vs NHPC: MUC5AC had the best individual performance for diagnosing PC with an OR = 2.78 (95% CI = 1.51-5.13), AUC = 0.81, and optimal SN/SP of 0.83 and 0.67, respectively. CA125 was increased in PC with an OR = 2.31 (95% CI = 1.4-4.0), AUC = 0.73, and optimal SN/SP of 0.88 and 0.67. CA19-9 was increased in PC with an OR = 1.5 (95% CI = 1.2-1.8), AUC = 0.76, and optimal SN/SP of 0.73 and 0.70. A combination of MUC1, MUC5AC, CA125, and CA19-9 outperformed all individual markers and had the largest AUC (0.89) with optimal SN/SP of 0.84 and 0.79. PC vs CP: MUC1 concentration in PC was significantly less than CP with an OR = 0.21 (95%CI = 0.088-0.49), AUC = 0.82, and optimal SN/SP of 0.87 and 0.78. PC vs NHPC+CP: MUC1 was decreased significantly in PC with an OR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44-0.96), AUC = 0.69, and optimal SN/SP of 0.87 and 0.63. CA125 was increased in PC with an OR = 1.64 (95%CI = 1.1-2.4), AUC = 0.66, and optimal SN/SP of 0.67 and 0.64. CA19-9 was increased in PC with an OR = 1.32 (95%CI = 1.1-1.6), AUC = 0.68, and optimal SN/SP of 0.63 and 0.67. A combination of MUC1, MUC5AC, CA125, and CA19-9 had an AUC = 0.86 with optimal SN/SP of 0.87 and 0.77 for PC. Conclusions: MUC1, MUC5AC, CA125, and CA19-9 combination provides a significantly improved diagnostic panel compared to any individual marker in pancreatic juice for detecting malignancy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. AB240
Author(s):  
Henning Schrader ◽  
Malte Wiese ◽  
Mark Ellrichmann ◽  
Bjoern A. Menge ◽  
Waldemar Uhl ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (9) ◽  
pp. 2846-2855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Nishizawa ◽  
Hiroki Harada ◽  
Yusuke Kumamoto ◽  
Takashi Kaizu ◽  
Hiroshi Katoh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document