scholarly journals Does competition and foreign investment spur industrial efficiency?: firm-level evidence from Indonesia

Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e04494
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Esquivias ◽  
Samuel Kharis Harianto
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Industrial Efficiency

Firm-Level Determinants of Foreign Investment and M&A Activity

2020 ◽  
pp. 1676-1705
Author(s):  
Mine Uğurlu
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Foreign Direct Investments ◽  
International Expansion ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Greenfield Investments

The last decade is marked with acceleration of mergers, corporate restructuring and governance activities. M&A activity has been driven by factors such as technological change, globalization, free trade, deregulation, attempts to attain economies of scale, rise in entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Corporations need to adjust to the change in the environment and expand their markets to achieve growth and protection against volatile economic conditions. Firms can achieve international expansion through foreign direct investments (FDIs) which can take the form of cross-border acquisitions (brownfield investments) and Greenfield investments. This chapter covers an overview of the literature on the determinants of FDI forms of entry, and M&A activity followed with an empirical investigation of the firm-level determinants of foreign investment in Turkey with emphasis on cross-border acquisitions and Greenfield investments. Summary of the findings is followed with the economic implications of forms of FDI entry. The concluding remarks cover the implications of the results for policy makers.

Determinants of foreign investment in Pakistan

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi Ullah ◽  
Muhammad Tahir
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Portfolio Investment ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Foreign Portfolio Investment ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Depositary Receipts

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the effect of country- and firm-specific factors on foreign investment in Pakistan.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses time-series data for country-level determinants and uses panel data for 100 listed non-financial companies selected based on market capitalisation from 2005 to 2015.FindingsFindings suggest that the stock market returns and liquidity of the country significantly positively influence the foreign portfolio investment (FPI) in Pakistan. Whereas, economic growth surprisingly is negatively related to foreign portfolio investment. In addition, findings reveal that firm size, financial leverage, dividend yield and global depositary receipts (GDR) have a positive impact on the total foreign investment at firm level. Further, foreign institutional investors prefer to invest in those firms that are large, pay high dividends and issue GDR. Furthermore, findings suggest that foreign direct investors tend to invest in firms that are financially leveraged and have low capital gain yield.Practical implicationsAt the country level, this study recommends that stock market performance, economic growth and foreign reserves of the country should be maintained and improved to attract FPI. At the firm level, this study recommends issuance of global depositary receipts and high dividend payouts for those firms that are interested in institutional investment in Pakistan.Originality/valueTo the best of authors' knowledge, this study is the first that examines the effect of firm-level factors along with country-level factors on foreign investment in Pakistan.

Investor Protection and the Role of Firm-Level Financial Transparency in Attracting Foreign Investment

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bowe Hansen ◽  
Mihail K. Miletkov ◽  
M. Babajide Wintoki
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Financial Transparency

Firm-Level Determinants of Foreign Investment and M&A Activity

2016 ◽  
pp. 265-292
Author(s):  
Mine Uğurlu
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Foreign Direct Investments ◽  
International Expansion ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Greenfield Investments

The last decade is marked with acceleration of mergers, corporate restructuring and governance activities. M&A activity has been driven by factors such as technological change, globalization, free trade, deregulation, attempts to attain economies of scale, rise in entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Corporations need to adjust to the change in the environment and expand their markets to achieve growth and protection against volatile economic conditions. Firms can achieve international expansion through foreign direct investments (FDIs) which can take the form of cross-border acquisitions (brownfield investments) and Greenfield investments. This chapter covers an overview of the literature on the determinants of FDI forms of entry, and M&A activity followed with an empirical investigation of the firm-level determinants of foreign investment in Turkey with emphasis on cross-border acquisitions and Greenfield investments. Summary of the findings is followed with the economic implications of forms of FDI entry. The concluding remarks cover the implications of the results for policy makers.

Does FDI crowd out domestic firms? Micro-level evidence from the Republic of Korea

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-416
Author(s):  
Hyelin Choi
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Foreign Firms ◽  
Crowding Out ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Domestic Firms ◽  
Crowd Out ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of the foreign investment on the exit and sales of the domestic firms. Furthermore, it studies whether domestic firms undergo different influences by foreign firms according to the size of domestic firms.Design/methodology/approachKorean firm-level data for the period of 2006 through 2013 provided by Statistics Korea are used to study the impact of the foreign investment on the exit and sales of the domestic firms.FindingsThe result shows that foreign firms crowd out small firms from the market and take their shares in the domestic market. On the other hand, larger firms rather enjoy positive spillover effect from foreign firms, reducing its exit probability and increasing sales. It may be that large firms have enough competitiveness and ability to learn and apply the advanced technology of the foreign firms.Practical implicationsDespite the strong belief on the positive impacts of the foreign firms such as knowledge spillovers or job creation, there might be crowding-out or market-stealing effect from the presence of foreign firms. If the latter effect is larger than positive effect, the incentives provided by host country government to the multinational firms cannot be justified. In this regard, the question addressed in this paper is very important.Originality/valueWhile most of previous papers have focused on the impacts of the foreign firms on productivity of the domestic firms, this paper deals with their impacts on the exit and sales of the domestic firms in order to examine more direct crowding-out and market-stealing effect of foreign firms.

How does the globalization of firms affect corruption in developing economies?

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bokyeong Park ◽  
Onon Khanoi
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Probit Model ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Exporting Firms ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Firm Level Data

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how firms’ characteristics related to globalization affect their perception on corruption and actual experiences in bribery. It focuses on two indicators of globalization, namely, foreign ownership and export, and confines the scope to developing economies. Design/methodology/approach This analysis uses firm-level data with observation over 60,000 collected from 94 developing economies. The paper employs the probit model to examine how firm characteristics related to globalization affect corruption perception (CP) and incidence. Findings The empirical results reveal that for foreign-invested companies, there is a substantial discrepancy between the perceived corruption and the actual. Although they are involved in bribery as frequently as, or less frequently than local firms, they have greater CPs. Exporting firms are more frequently solicited for bribes, but the effect disappears when time spent for government contact is controlled for. Consequently, foreign investment partly contributes to the corruption control, but the export orientation of firms rather aggravates corruption due to regulative environments in developing economies. Practical implications This study provides policy implications that the corruption control through globalization requires streamlining of administration procedure related to foreign investment or trade and, thus, shortening time to deal with public officials. In addition, governments need to emphasize the importance of foreign investment and prevent unethical practices mediated by local partners. Originality/value The greatest novelty of this paper lies in using firm level data instead of country level unlike most of the literature. Moreover, the authors focus on firms only in developing economies. As well, unlike most studies using only perception indicators as the proxy of corruption, this paper considers both CPs and actual incidence, and compares each other.

scholarly journals US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US-Based Multinational Firms

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rema Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Investment ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Clean Air Act ◽  
Econometric Models ◽  
Substantial Variation ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Regulated Firms ◽  
Firm Level Data ◽  
Clean Air

This paper measures the response of US-based multinationals to the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). Using a panel of firm-level data over the period 1966–1999, I estimate the effect of regulation on a multinational's foreign production decisions. The CAAA induced substantial variation in the degree of regulation faced by firms, allowing for the estimation of econometric models that control for firm-specific characteristics and industrial trends. I find that the CAAA caused regulated multinational firms to increase their foreign assets by 5.3 percent and their foreign output by 9 percent. Heavily regulated firms did not disproportionately increase foreign investment in developing countries. (JEL F23, K32, L51, Q52, Q53, Q58)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document