scholarly journals Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 580-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dev Basu ◽  
Preet Mohinder Singh ◽  
Anubhooti Tiwari ◽  
Basavana Goudra
2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore De Rosa ◽  
Daniele Torella ◽  
Gianluca Caiazzo ◽  
Salvatore Giampà ◽  
Ciro Indolfi

2019 ◽  
pp. 105477381988317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Fen Su ◽  
Wen-Ting Yeh

To clarify the effectiveness of music intervention for improving the well-being of patients undergoing coronary procedures for coronary heart disease, we conducted full-text searches of various databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Airiti Library; 1966–2019) to identify randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies of music intervention in recipients of angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Outcome measures included anxiety, discomfort, pain, heart rate, and blood pressure. The Cochrane methodology, Jadad Quality Score, and ROBINS-I were employed to evaluate evidence from 10 studies. Music intervention reduced anxiety (effect size: Z = 2.15, p = .03; six studies) and discomfort of lying ( Z = 2.40, p = .02; two studies), but did not affect pain ( Z = 0.94; two studies), heart rate ( Z = 0.94; five studies), or blood pressure (systolic, Z = 1.27; diastolic, Z = 1.32; four studies) (all p > .05). The heterogeneity among studies was high. Large-scale, transcultural, high-quality trials are warranted to confirm the benefit of music intervention in patients undergoing coronary procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document