A hybrid BIM and BN-based model to improve the resiliency of hospitals' utility systems in disasters

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 102176
Author(s):  
Ali TohidiFar ◽  
Milad Mousavi ◽  
Amin Alvanchi
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-606
Author(s):  
Yasushi Tomita ◽  
Junichi Murata

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302098802
Author(s):  
Janise Rodgers ◽  
Wael Hassan ◽  
Christopher Motter ◽  
John Thornley

The 2018 M7.1 Anchorage earthquake damaged over 120 schools in the Anchorage and Matanuska-Susitna (Mat-Su) School Districts. Many remained closed for a week or more for cleanup and repairs, primarily due to nonstructural damage. Major structural damage occurred in three of 132 school buildings across both districts, and a number of additional schools had minor to moderate damage. Most observed damage was to nonstructural components, including suspended ceilings, lighting, architectural finishes, building utility systems, and equipment. Middle and high schools were in session at the time of the earthquake. Despite ceiling damage and fallen ceiling tiles, books, and supplies (heavy furniture was anchored) and objects swinging from the ceiling, both districts reported very few injuries. Statements by the school districts and administrators, media reports, and available video indicate that most students dropped, covered, and held on as practiced in regular drills. The combination of life-safety structural performance (with a few exceptions) due in part to moderate shaking, as well as anchoring of heavy furnishings, and student preparedness and drills to practice protective action, appears to have protected students. Both districts’ experiences provide evidence that school seismic safety programs are valuable, even if efforts to mitigate risks from older, vulnerable schools are in process and more work remains.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Steve Doyle ◽  
Robin Smith
Keyword(s):  

CORROSION ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
C. F. AVILA ◽  
A. B. JONES

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Rodrigues ◽  
António F Tavares

This work contributes to the literature on water governance by attempting to provide an answer to the question of what are the differences in efficiency of alternative governance arrangements of water utilities. We test hypotheses derived from property rights, principal–agent, and transaction costs theories using a comprehensive database of 260 water utility systems provided by the Portuguese Regulatory Authority of Water and Waste Services. Using endogenous switching regression models estimated through maximum likelihood, the study is designed in two steps. First, we investigate differences in efficiency between in-house options and externalization and find that in-house solutions as a set (direct provision and municipal companies) are more efficient than externalization options (mixed companies and concessions). Second, we test differences in efficiency within both in-house and externalization solutions, and fail to find statistically significant differences in efficiency between in-house bureaucracies and municipal companies and between mixed companies and concessions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document