Structural performance of buildings during the 30 November 2018 M7.1 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake

Southcentral Alaska, the most populous region in Alaska, was violently shaken by a Mw 7.1 earthquake on 30 November 2018 at 8:29 am Alaska Standard Time. This was the largest magnitude earthquake in the United States close to a population center in over 50 years. The earthquake was 46 km deep, and the epicenter was 12 km north of Anchorage and 19 km west of Eagle River. The event affected some 400,000 residents, causing widespread damage in highways, nonstructural components, non-engineered and older buildings, and structures on poorly compacted fills. A few isolated serious injuries and partial collapses took place. Minor structural damage to code-conforming buildings was observed. A significant percentage of the structural damage was due to geotechnical failures. Building stock diversity allows use of the region as a large test bed to observe how local building practices affected earthquake damage levels. The prevailing peak ground acceleration (PGA) was 0.2–0.32 g, causing shaking intensity at most sites of 50%–60% of the ASCE 7-16 design basis earthquake acceleration. Thus, the seismic vulnerability of building stock in the region was not truly tested. Reinforced concrete buildings had minor structural damage, except in a few cases of shear wall and transfer girder shear cracking. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-retrofitted buildings performed satisfactorily. Concrete-masonry-unit (CMU) masonry buildings experienced serious structural damage in many cases, including relatively newer buildings. The earthquake caused widespread structural damage in non-engineered buildings (primarily wood and CMU masonry) that exist widely in the region, especially in Eagle River. Of these, non-engineered single-family wood buildings had the heaviest structural damage. No structural damage could be observed in steel buildings. The aftershock sequence, which included 7 M5+ and 50 M4+ events, exacerbated structural damage in all types of buildings. The present study is based on the EERI field reconnaissance mission conducted by the authors following the earthquake. Based on the observed damage and structural performance, seismic risk mitigation recommendations are suggested.

Comparative Study of Seismic Acceleration Amplification Models for RC Frame Structures

As the current aspect, the nonstructural components (NSCs) linked with the structures are more affected during the seismic motion. It causes not only loss of the economy but also affected life. The various codal provision has been available for minimizing the damages of primary components, but for NSCs, a minimal requirement is functional. So that more investigation is required for understating the behavior of NSCs during the seismic motion. The research aims to understand the behavior of acceleration demand on NSCs in a building. Structures subjected to inertia forces due to earthquakes experience damage of nonstructural components (NSC). The inertia force acting the NSCs are related to acceleration amplification factor. For obtaining the peak horizontal floor acceleration with respect to tectonic ground motion, these factors are used. In this paper, mathematical models of the acceleration amplification factor defined as the peak floor acceleration with respect to peak ground acceleration, given by previous researchers, has been compared. For this 2,4,6,8 and 10 storey moment-resisting frame models considering 29 ground motion data ranging between 0.1g to 0.2g, is analyzed using linear time history method. The supports of the models are considered fixed. The ETABS software is used for the analysis of the models. To analyses the models, the modal mass participation ratio plays a significant role. ASCE 7-05 defines that the structure should be investigated and designed when the model mass participation ratio is equal to or more than 90 per cent. Based on the results, a comparison of the reported models is made. There is a strong need for further research to refine the models for the realistic prediction of acceleration amplification factor.

Seismic Experimental Assessment of Remote Terminal Unit System with Friction Pendulum under Triaxial Shake Table Tests

In recent years, earthquakes have caused more damage to nonstructural components, such as mechanical and electrical equipment and piping systems, than to structural components. In particular, among the nonstructural components, the electrical cabinet is an essential piece of equipment used to maintain the functionality of critical facilities such as nuclear and non-nuclear power plants. Therefore, damage to the electrical cabinet associated with the safety of the facility can lead to severe accidents related to loss-of-life and property damage. Consequently, the electrical cabinet system must be protected against strong ground motion. This paper presents an exploratory study of dynamic characteristics of seismically isolated remote terminal unit (RTU) cabinet system subjected to tri-axial shaking table, and also the shaking table test of the non-seismically isolated cabinet system was conducted to compare the vibration characteristics with the cabinet system installed with friction pendulum isolator device. In addition, for the shaking table test, two recorded earthquakes obtained from Korea and artificial earthquakes based on the common application of building seismic-resistant design standards as an input ground motions were applied. The experimental assessment showed that the various damage modes such as door opening, the fall of the wire mold, and damage to door lock occurred in the RTU panel fixed on the concrete foundation by a set anchor, but the damage occurred only at the seismic isolator in the seismically isolated RTU panel system. Furthermore, it was considered that the application of the seismic isolator can effectively mitigate the impact and amplification of seismic force to the RTU panel system during and after strong ground motions in this study.

An Analytical Approximation to the Seismic Response of Light Linear Nonstructural Components in Resonance With Linear Structures

This paper considers the analytical calculation of the seismic response of light nonstructural components resonant with the buildings to which they are affixed. The mechanical systems thus conformed are presumed to be linearly elastic and classically damped, such that a traditional modal analysis can be carried out. Intended to estimate the upper limit of the response, the procedure developed is indicated for resonance with the fundamental mode, a condition which usually controls the response of the components. The correlation of the two closely spaced modes resulting from the dynamics of the component-building system, is accounted for through a spectral analysis. Comparison of the results predicted by the procedure described in this paper with limited numerical applications, corroborates that it is successful in predicting the response of the components when these are tuned to low order modes of the carrying structure. However, as also seen, the procedure is inappropriate to calculate the response of the components when their tuning involves higher modes of the supporting structure. Given the successful numerical forecasting of the response of the components, and given the compact form of the proposed equations, the feasibility of developing their codified form merits further investigation.

Seismic Fragility of Chinese Light-Gauge Steel Keel Gypsum Board Partition Walls

A quasi-static experimental program of light-gauge steel keel gypsum board partition walls (LSKGBPW) was carried out to evaluate the seismic damage phenomena, failure mechanisms, and fragility. The 15 specimens in five groups were designed per current Chinese codes and engineering practice. Then, three damage states were defined based on the damage and repair measures, and the fragility data of each group were presented, providing basic data for the estimation of seismic damage and consequential loss of nonstructural components.