An international study of hospitalized cancer patients’ health status, nursing care quality, perceived individuality in care and trust in nurses: A path analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 176-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Charalambous ◽  
Laurel Radwin ◽  
Agneta Berg ◽  
Katarina Sjovall ◽  
Elisabeth Patiraki ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mar Zulueta Egea ◽  
María Prieto-Ursúa ◽  
Laura Bermejo Toro

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (15-16) ◽  
pp. 2185-2195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Lucero ◽  
Eileen T Lake ◽  
Linda H Aiken

Kontakt ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-248
Author(s):  
Petra Papoušková ◽  
Jiřina Otásková ◽  
Iva Brabcová

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederike Bokemeyer ◽  
Lukas Lange-Drenth ◽  
Pascal Jean-Pierre ◽  
Holger Schulz ◽  
Christiane Bleich

Abstract Background Patient satisfaction is a fundamental aspect of perceived health care quality. The original English version of the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-related Care (PSCC) is a psychometrically validated, one-dimensional instrument with relevance to cancer-related care. The goal of the study was to perform a psychometric validation of the PSCC in German (PSCC-G). Methods A sample of 394 cancer patients were recruited at oncological clinics in Hamburg, Germany. Patients completed the PSCC-G, three subscales of the Patient Satisfaction and Quality in Oncological Care (PASQOC), and one subscale from the German version of the Recherché Evaluative sur la Performance des Réseaux de Santé (RESPERE-60) questionnaire. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) to determine the factorial validity, and we calculated Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (α) to test the internal consistency of the PSCC-G. We examined the correlation between the PSCC-G and four subscales measuring additional dimensions of PS with care. We also conducted a multiple linear regression analysis to determine whether sociodemographics, self-perceived health status, and treatment setting predict scores on the PSCC-G. Results The EFA (using principal axis) revealed a one-factor solution. The Cronbach’s α was 0.92. The convergent validity showed high correlations between three different subscales measuring patient satisfaction and the PSCC-G. Overall, males, older age patients, and those with a higher self-perceived health status were more satisfied with their cancer care based on their higher scores on the PSCC-G. Conclusion The PSCC-G is a reliable and valid instrument that can assess satisfaction with cancer-related care for German-speaking cancer patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 875-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. Martinez ◽  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Jennifer L. Malin ◽  
Sydney M. Dy

AbstractObjective:Despite treatment availability, many cancer patients experience severe pain. Although patient assessments of care are increasingly employed to evaluate quality of care, little is known about its association with cancer symptom burden. The objective of our study was to examine the association between patient-reported quality of care and pain severity in a nationally representative cohort of cancer patients.Method:Quality of care was measured in three domains: physician communication, care coordination/responsiveness, and nursing care. Quality scores were dichotomized as optimal versus nonoptimal. Pain was measured on a scale of 0 (least) to 100 (worst). We utilized multivariable linear regression to examine the association between patient-reported quality of care and pain severity.Results:The analytic sample included 2,746 individuals. Fifty and 54% of patients, respectively, rated physician communication and care coordination/responsiveness as nonoptimal; 28% rated nursing care as nonoptimal. In adjusted models, rating physician communication as nonoptimal (versus optimal) was associated with a 1.8-point higher pain severity (p = 0.018), and rating care coordination/responsiveness as nonoptimal was associated with a 2.2-point higher pain severity (p = 0.006).Significance of results:Patient-reported quality of care was significantly associated with pain severity, although the differences were small. Interventions targeting physician communication and care coordination/responsiveness may result in improved pain control for some patients.


Medical Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 644
Author(s):  
Robert L. Kane ◽  
Christine Mueller ◽  
Tatyana Shamliyan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document