scholarly journals A New Entropic Algorithm to Measure the Impact of Magnetic Field on Dose Distribution: Application to MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy

Author(s):  
J.L. Feugeas ◽  
P. Nicolaï ◽  
J. Page ◽  
G. Birindelli ◽  
J. Caron ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (18) ◽  
pp. 6791-6807 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Beld ◽  
P R Seevinck ◽  
J J W Lagendijk ◽  
M A Viergever ◽  
M A Moerland

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Cusumano ◽  
Stefania Teodoli ◽  
Francesca Greco ◽  
Andrea Fidanzio ◽  
Luca Boldrini ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6Part36) ◽  
pp. 3768-3768 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Low ◽  
S Mutic ◽  
S Shvartsman ◽  
T Chmielewski ◽  
G Fought ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-45
Author(s):  
Wei Zou ◽  
Goldie Kurtz ◽  
Mayisha Nakib ◽  
Brendan Burgdorf ◽  
Murat Alp ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The intracranial skull-base meningioma is in proximity to multiple critical organs and heterogeneous tissues. Steep dose gradients often result from avoiding critical organs in proton treatment plans. Dose uncertainties arising from setup errors under image-guided radiation therapy are worthy of evaluation. Patients and Methods Fourteen patients with skull-base meningioma were retrospectively identified and planned with proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) single-field uniform dose (SFUD) and multifield optimization (MFO) techniques. The setup uncertainties were assigned a probability model on the basis of prior published data. The impact on the dose distribution from nominal 1-mm and large, less probable setup errors, as well as the cumulative effect, was analyzed. The robustness of SFUD and MFO planning techniques in these scenarios was discussed. Results The target coverage was reduced and the plan dose hot spot increased by all setup uncertainty scenarios regardless of the planning techniques. For 1 mm nominal shifts, the deviations in clinical target volume (CTV) coverage D99% was −11 ± 52 cGy and −45 ± 147 cGy for SFUD and MFO plans. The setup uncertainties affected the organ at risk (OAR) dose both positively and negatively. The statistical average of the setup uncertainties had <100 cGy impact on the plan qualities for all patients. The cumulative deviations in CTV D95% were 1 ± 34 cGy and −7 ± 18 cGy for SFUD and MFO plans. Conclusion It is important to understand the impact of setup uncertainties on skull-base meningioma, as the tumor target has complex shape and is in proximity to multiple critical organs. Our work evaluated the setup uncertainty based on its probability distribution and evaluated the dosimetric consequences. In general, the SFUD plans demonstrated more robustness than the MFO plans in target coverages and brainstem dose. The probability-weighted overall effect on the dose distribution is small compared to the dosimetric shift during single fraction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S681-S682
Author(s):  
D. Cusumano ◽  
L. Boldrini ◽  
L. Azario ◽  
S. Teodoli ◽  
M. Balducci ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
T. Stanescu ◽  
T. Tadic ◽  
J. Marle ◽  
J. Winter ◽  
M. Sweitzer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuxu Zhang ◽  
Songgui Luo ◽  
Hui Yu ◽  
Shengqu Lin ◽  
Weibin Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of different dose algorithms and calculation angle intervals (DCAI) on the in vivo dose (IVD) verification of small-field arc therapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).MethodsWe made an exit-dose-measuring and positioning device (EDPD) for the SRS MapCHECK (SMC) using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Computed tomography data for the anthropomorphic head phantom, SMC, and EDPD combination were acquired with 1 mm slice thickness and spacing. SBRT partial arc plans were created using an SBRT cone, block, and a small square open field, with a gantry rotation angle of 60°. The dose distribution was calculated using three different dose algorithms [Pencil Beam (PB), CC Convolution (CCC), and Monte Carlo (MC)], with 1 mm isotropic resolution. We also used three different DCAIs (1°, 3°, 5°) with the PB and CCC algorithms to calculate the dose distribution of each plan three times. The uncertainty of each control point for the MC algorithm was set to 1%. The SMC was used to measure the exit dose outside the phantom for IVD verification, the detector plane was located 182.5 mm outside the scan center.ResultsWithin the phantom, the minimum passing rate of 3D gamma analysis (1%/1 mm) for the dose distributions calculated at different DCAIs was 99.1%, and the maximum relative deviation (RD) of the central point dose (CPD) was <0.2%. The average RD of the CPD for IVD verification was about 30% (range 16.71%–50.0%) for PB; -0.36% ± 1.82% (1° DCAI), -3.18% ± 7.83% (3° DCAI), and 3.69% ± 11.56% (1° DCAI) for CCC; and -0.38% ± 0.76 for the MC algorithm. The passing rates of 2D gamma analysis (3%/3 mm) between the predicted exit dose and the IVD were 100% for MC and >90% for the CCC algorithm at 1° DCAI.ConclusionThe DCAI for exit-dose calculations should be ≤1° using the CCC algorithm. Furthermore, among the three algorithms verified in the current study, the MC algorithm showed the highest accuracy, followed by CCC, with the PB algorithm having the worst performance. The PB algorithm is thus not suitable for exit-dose calculation or IVD verification of SBRT.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part30) ◽  
pp. 505-505
Author(s):  
T Stanescu ◽  
T Tadic ◽  
J Marle ◽  
J Winter ◽  
L Petropoulos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document