A Multi-Platform Treatment Planning Benchmark Study for Spinal Radiosurgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. E768-E769
Author(s):  
C. Moustakis ◽  
M.K.H. Chan ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
J. Nilsson ◽  
A. Bergman ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1138-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Yu ◽  
William Main ◽  
David Taylor ◽  
Gopinath Kuduvalli ◽  
Michael L.J. Apuzzo ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery requires the highest degree of accuracy in target identification and localization. When targeting paraspinal lesions, the CyberKnife radiosurgical system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) uses implanted stainless steel fiducials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the total system for clinically relevant accuracy of this approach. METHODS: The clinically relevant accuracy of the CyberKnife depends on 1) the accuracy of beam delivery, which in turn represents a compilation of robot and camera image-tracking errors, and 2) the inherent accuracy of target localization that stems from computed tomographic imaging and treatment planning. The clinically relevant accuracy was measured at three different CyberKnife facilities using head and torso phantoms loaded with packs of radiochromic film and expressed as a displacement of the dose contours from the treatment planning. RESULTS: The mean clinically relevant error, as measured at three different CyberKnife facilities, was determined to be 0.7 ± 0.3 mm, which did not vary with computed tomographic slice thickness in a range of 0.625 to 1.5 mm. The average treatment delivery precision was 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. Fiducial tracking error was less than 0.3 mm for radial translations up to 14 mm and less than 0.7 mm for rotations up to 4.5 degrees. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of relatively stationary spinal lesions targeted with fiducial tracking, the CyberKnife system is capable of submillimeter accuracy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 194 (9) ◽  
pp. 843-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Moustakis ◽  
Mark K. H. Chan ◽  
Jinkoo Kim ◽  
Joakim Nilsson ◽  
Alanah Bergman ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part12) ◽  
pp. 2475-2476
Author(s):  
S Kumar ◽  
S Ryu ◽  
Q Chen ◽  
S Sheim ◽  
B Movsas ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 412-412
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Tewari ◽  
Assaad El-Hakim ◽  
Peter N. Schlegel ◽  
Mani Menon ◽  
Deirdre M. Coll

Author(s):  
Irving B. Weiner

Abstract. This article concerns the utility of ego psychoanalytic perspectives in Rorschach interpretation. Psychoanalytic ego psychology focuses on how people cope with events in their lives and how effectively they can meet challenges to their sense of well-being. The way people deal with experienced distress constitutes their defensive style and determines to a large extent what kind of person they are. Adequate defenses against anxiety promote comfortable and productive adjustment, whereas ineffective defenses typically cause adjustment difficulties and susceptibility to psychological disorders. In Rorschach assessment, the nature and effectiveness of a person’s defensive style can often be identified with a sequence analysis that integrates the structural, thematic, and behavioral features in the protocol. In particular, the sequential quality of responses, especially preceding and following instances of cognitive slippage, can help identify causes of upsetting concerns, defensive efforts to alleviating these concerns, and the adequacy of these defensive efforts in restoring equanimity. This interpretive process is illustrated with attention to implications for differential diagnosis and treatment planning in the Rorschach protocol of a 20-year-old suicidal woman.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document