Estimating the term structure of corporate bond liquidity premiums: An analysis of default free bank bonds

Author(s):  
Diego Leal ◽  
Bryan Stanhouse ◽  
Duane Stock
2016 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Han ◽  
Hao Zhou

We estimate the non-default component of corporate bond yield spreads and examine its relationship with bond liquidity. We measure bond liquidity using intraday transactions data and estimate the default component using the term structure of credit default swaps (CDS) spreads. With swap rate as the risk free rate, the estimated non-default component is generally moderate but statistically significant for AA-, A-, and BBB-rated bonds and increasing in this order. With Treasury rate as the risk free rate, the estimated non-default component is the largest in basis points for BBB-rated bonds but, as a fraction of yield spreads, it is the largest for AAA-rated bonds. Controlling for the unobservable firm heterogeneity, we find a positive and significant relationship between the non-default component and illiquidity for investment-grade bonds but no significant relationship for speculative-grade bonds. We also find that the non-default component comoves with indicators for macroeconomic conditions.


CFA Digest ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-30
Author(s):  
Joseph D.V. Vu

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID F. BABBEL

AbstractThe Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's (PBGC) Pension Insurance Modeling System model has taken on the Herculean task of modeling in detail and under many scenarios the cash outflows associated with the pension obligations, they have assumed. This paper's comments are focused almost entirely upon the PBGC's termination liabilities, and address four pressing issues: (1) the need to discount the liability stream by current riskless interest rates instead of using corporate bond rates that reflect credit risk, call risk, and other risks, or using some ad hoc prescribed average of past rates; (2) the need to use a term structure of interest rates; (3) the need to employ more useful investment management benchmarks; and (4) how to implement a relevant and rigorous liability benchmark.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Zhou ◽  
Keh-Chian (Oliver) Chang ◽  
Simi Kedia ◽  
Jason Zhanshun Wei

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-86
Author(s):  
Akihiro Kawada ◽  
Takayuki Shiohama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document