Using the internet to enhance drug safety monitoring from phase 1 to phase 4 in dermatology clinical trials

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. P82
Author(s):  
Jules T. Mitchel ◽  
Otto Mills
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhao Liu ◽  
Jo Wick ◽  
Renee’ H. Martin ◽  
Caitlyn Meinzer ◽  
Dooti Roy ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Monitoring and reporting of drug safety during a clinical trial is essential to its success. More recent attention to drug safety has encouraged statistical methods development for monitoring and detecting potential safety signals. This paper investigates the potential impact of the process of the blinded investigator identifying a potential safety signal, which should be further investigated by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board with an unblinded safety data analysis. Methods In this paper, two-stage Bayesian hierarchical models are proposed for safety signal detection following a pre-specified set of interim analyses that are applied to efficacy. At stage 1, a hierarchical blinded model uses blinded safety data to detect a potential safety signal and at stage 2, a hierarchical logistic model is applied to confirm the signal with unblinded safety data. Results Any interim safety monitoring analysis is usually scheduled via negotiation between the trial sponsor and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. The proposed safety monitoring process starts once 53 subjects have been enrolled into an eight-arm phase II clinical trial for the first interim analysis. Operating characteristics describing the performance of this proposed workflow are investigated using simulations based on the different scenarios. Conclusions The two-stage Bayesian safety procedure in this paper provides a statistical view to monitor safety during the clinical trials. The proposed two-stage monitoring model has an excellent accuracy of detecting and flagging a potential safety signal at stage 1, and with the most important feature that further action at stage 2 could confirm the safety issue.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preciosa M. Coloma ◽  
Martijn J. Schuemie ◽  
Gianluca Trifirò ◽  
Rosa Gini ◽  
Ron Herings ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A333
Author(s):  
J. Furet ◽  
C. Genane ◽  
G. Ando ◽  
G. Marinoni

Drug Safety ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 873-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osemeke U. Osokogu ◽  
Caitlin Dodd ◽  
Alexandra Pacurariu ◽  
Florentia Kaguelidou ◽  
Daniel Weibel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-213
Author(s):  
E. V. Shubnikova ◽  
T. M. Bukatina ◽  
G. V. Kutekhova

Experts of the Department for Evaluation of Medicinal Products’ Safety of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products analysed administrative decisions of foreign regulatory authorities on limiting the use of some medicinal products and/or the need to introduce changes in patient information leaflets due to changes in the medicines’ safety profiles. The analysis helped to identify 16 administrative decisions that contain information on the following medicines registered in Russia: duloxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, сitalopram, desvenlafaxine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, milnacipran, paroxetine, venlafaxine, vortioxetine, mirtazapine, risperidone, clozapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, lacosamide, gabapentin, pregabalin. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document