Patch testing results in skin of color: A retrospective review from the Massachusetts General Hospital contact dermatitis clinic

Author(s):  
Cristina M. Foschi ◽  
Idy Tam ◽  
Peter C. Schalock ◽  
JiaDe Yu
Dermatitis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-208
Author(s):  
Idy Tam ◽  
Peter C. Schalock ◽  
Ernesto González ◽  
JiaDe Yu

2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Camacho-Halili ◽  
Sara Axelrod ◽  
Mary Ann Michelis ◽  
Sebastian Lighvani ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  

Dermatitis ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilla Landeck ◽  
Peter C. Schalock ◽  
Lynn A. Baden ◽  
Konrad Neumann ◽  
Ernesto Gonzalez

Dermatitis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 359-366
Author(s):  
Idy Tam ◽  
JiaDe Yu ◽  
Lauren N. Ko ◽  
Peter C. Schalock

Author(s):  
Ronald S. Weinstein ◽  
N. Scott McNutt

The Type I simple cold block device was described by Bullivant and Ames in 1966 and represented the product of the first successful effort to simplify the equipment required to do sophisticated freeze-cleave techniques. Bullivant, Weinstein and Someda described the Type II device which is a modification of the Type I device and was developed as a collaborative effort at the Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Auckland, New Zealand. The modifications reduced specimen contamination and provided controlled specimen warming for heat-etching of fracture faces. We have now tested the Mass. General Hospital version of the Type II device (called the “Type II-MGH device”) on a wide variety of biological specimens and have established temperature and pressure curves for routine heat-etching with the device.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document