scholarly journals TCT-394 The Comparison Of Long Term Clinical Outcomes In Patients With Or Without Jailed Side Branch After Coronary Bifurcation Stenting

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (18) ◽  
pp. B123-B124
Author(s):  
Hyun Jong Lee ◽  
Rak Kyong Choi ◽  
Je Sang Kim
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 1247-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo Cho ◽  
Tae Soo Kang ◽  
Jung-Sun Kim ◽  
Sung-Jin Hong ◽  
Dong-Ho Shin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Helen Routledge ◽  

The favoured approach for coronary bifurcation disease is provisional stenting, which involves stenting the main vessel (MV) and ignoring the side branch unless clinical circumstances warrant placement of a second stent. This approach is based on a number of studies showing that provisional stenting is superior to conventional two-stent approaches. There is reason to suspect, however, that the conventional wisdom regarding provisional stenting does not accurately reflect the risks and benefits of a traditional two-stent approach. Analysis of studies (e.g. Nordic I; Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents [CACTUS]; and the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New and Evolving Strategies [BBC ONE]) shows that provisional stenting frequently has similar long-term outcomes to a conventional two-stent approach in some patient populations. The long-term superiority of provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation disease depends on measuring a periprocedural or post-procedural rise in cardiac enzymes; removing this measure results in similar long-term outcomes between provisional and conventional two-stent approaches. New technologies or techniques will hopefully yield clear, unambiguous improvement in coronary bifurcation stenting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e425-e432
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Murasato ◽  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Kyohei Meno ◽  
Kodai Shibao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document