TCT-540 Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Echocardiography Compared With Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve for the Diagnosis of Haemodynamically Significant Stenosis(Es) in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE: Sixty-four multi detector computed tomography angiography (64-MDCT) has emerged as a rapidly developing method for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease with high negative predictive value and relatively low positive predictive value, especially in patients with intermediate-severity coronary artery disease (ISCAD). There are, however, few studies regarding with optimal threshold for detection of physiologically significant stenosis in 64-MDCT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal threshold for 64-MDCT to detect physiologically significant stenosis using fractional flow reserve of the myocardium (FFRmyo) in patients with ISCAD. METHODS: We enrolled single lesions detected by 64-MDCT of 64 ISCAD patients (age, 68.3 +/− 10.2 years; 78% male). FFRmyo </= 0.75 measured by a 0.014-inch pressure wire was used as the gold standard for presence of physiologically significant stenosis. The area stenosis (%AS) in 64-MDCT were compared with the results of FFRmyo and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) in quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) during elective coronary angiography. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimum threshold for percent area stenosis (%AS) in 64-MDCT was determined in the prediction of FFRmyo </= 0.75. RESULTS: There was an inverse correlation between %AS in 64-MDCT and FFRmyo (65 +/− 20 % and 0.71 +/− 0.16, respectively; r = −0.67; p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between %AS in 64-MDCT and %DS in QCA (65 +/− 20 % and 63 +/− 19 %, respectively; r = 0.69; p < 0.01). Using a cutoff of 62 %AS in 64-MDCT, ROC curve analysis shows 79 % sensitivity, 85 % specificity, 82% positive predictive value, 83% negative predictive value and 83% accuracy for detecting physiologically significant stenosis. CONCLUSION: > 62 %AS in 64-MDCT could predict the physiologically significant coronary stenosis in patients with ISCAD. Applying an alternative threshold to detect physiologically significant stenosis might contribute to improve the diagnostic accuracy for 64-MDCT in patients with ISCAD.

Download Full-text

Validation of the European Society of Cardiology pre-test probability model for obstructive coronary artery disease

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa755 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Simon Winther ◽

Samuel Emil Schmidt ◽

Laust Dupont Rasmussen ◽

Luis Eduardo Juárez Orozco ◽

Flemming Hald Steffensen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery Disease ◽

Coronary Artery ◽

European Society ◽

Probability Model ◽

Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽

Fractional Flow ◽

Flow Reserve ◽

Artery Disease ◽

European Society Of Cardiology ◽

Test Probability

Abstract Aims Estimation of pre-test probability (PTP) of disease in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common challenge. Due to decreasing prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients referred for diagnostic testing, the European Society of Cardiology suggested a new PTP (2019-ESC-PTP) model. The aim of this study was to validate that model. Methods and results Symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) due to suspected CAD in a geographical uptake area of 3.3 million inhabitants were included. The reference standard was a combined endpoint of CTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with obstructive CAD defined at ICA as a ≥50% diameter stenosis or fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 when performed. The 2019-ESC-PTP, 2013-ESC-PTP, and CAD Consortium basic PTP scores were calculated based on age, sex, and symptoms. Of the 42 328 identified patients, coronary stenosis was detected in 8.8% using the combined endpoint. The 2019-ESC-PTP and CAD Consortium basic scores classified substantially more patients into the low PTP groups (PTP < 15%) than did the 2013-ESC-PTP (64% and 65% vs. 16%, P < 0.001). Using the combined endpoint as reference, calibration of the 2019-ESC-PTP model was superior to the 2013-ESC-PTP and CAD Consortium basic score. Conclusion The new 2019-ESC-PTP model is well calibrated and superior to the previously recommended models in predicting obstructive stenosis detected by a combined endpoint of CTA and ICA.

Download Full-text