Erratum to “Studies on the liquid junction potential corrections of electrolytes at aqueous + mixed solvent boundaries” [J. Electroanal. Chem., 237 (1987) 149–162]

2018 ◽  
Vol 808 ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
G. Senanayake ◽  
D.M. Muir
1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1633 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Berne ◽  
C Kahanda ◽  
O Popovych

The component of the liquid-junction potential due to the diffusion of ions across an interface of electrolyte solutions in different solvents was formulated by taking into account the solvent dependence of the transport numbers, t, and of the chemical potentials of ions in the interphase region as determined from experimental data on their variation in the mixed-solvent compositions. The new equation was applied to NaCl/NaCl and HCl/HCl junctions between water and methanol-water solvents over the entire solvent range. Significant differences between the results obtained with the new equation and the old formulation, which treated the transport numbers as solvent-independent, were observed only for the HCl junctions involving 90-100 wt % aqueous methanol, where tH exhibits a sharp minimum as a function of the solvent composition.


1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 921 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kahanda ◽  
O Popovych

Values of Ej,ion, the ionic component of the liquid-junction potential Ej, were calculated for the HCl,H2O |HCl,S2 and KCl,H2O | KCl,S2 junctions, where S2 was EtOH-H2O, HCONMe2- H2O and Me2SO-H2O solvents, and for the AgNO3,H2O | AgNO3,MeCN-H2O junction, over the entire mixed-solvent ranges. Both the old approximate equation for Ej,ion and our improved equation, which accounts for the variation of the ionic transport numbers t and chemical potentials Go in the interphase region, were used. Significant differences between the two equations were observed for systems where the t and ΔtG° functions dnisplayed extrema against the mixed-solvent composition. The highest Ej,ion value was 395 mV, for the HCl,H2O | HCl,Me2SO junction. Values of Ej,s,the solvent component of Ej, were calculated by subtracting the corresponding Ej,ion values from the total Ej, which was evaluated in each case from the e.m.f , of a cell with the liquid junction of interest and the transfer activity coefficient of the electroactive ion, estimated by the tetraphenylborate assumption. The magnitude of Ej,s was significant for the junctions between H2O and most of the solvents, and was particularly large for those involving dipolar aprotic solvents and highly solvated ions. The maximum Ej,s value was -201 mV, observed for the junction HCl,H2O|HCl,100% Me2SO.


Electrochem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-215
Author(s):  
Jerzy J. Jasielec

This work is aimed to give an electrochemical insight into the ionic transport phenomena in the cellular environment of organized brain tissue. The Nernst–Planck–Poisson (NPP) model is presented, and its applications in the description of electrodiffusion phenomena relevant in nanoscale neurophysiology are reviewed. These phenomena include: the signal propagation in neurons, the liquid junction potential in extracellular space, electrochemical transport in ion channels, the electrical potential distortions invisible to patch-clamp technique, and calcium transport through mitochondrial membrane. The limitations, as well as the extensions of the NPP model that allow us to overcome these limitations, are also discussed.


1985 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
A H Maas ◽  
O Siggaard-Andersen ◽  
H F Weisberg ◽  
W G Zijlstra

Abstract For clinical purposes the activities of Na+ and K+ obtained with ion-selective electrodes in undiluted whole blood or serum should be multiplied by an appropriate factor to obtain the same values as the substance concentrations obtained by flame photometry. The factor is primarily dependent on the mass concentration of water in normal plasma divided by the molal activity coefficient of Na+ (or K+) of normal plasma. We discuss the value of the molal activity coefficient of Na+ obtained by theoretical calculations and by direct measurement. The discrepancies between theory and measurement (gamma Na+ of 0.747 and 0.73, respectively) may be due to some binding of Na+ (protein binding or ion pair formation), a small and variable residual liquid-junction potential, or certainty about the appropriate value for the ionic strength of normal plasma (0.16 mol/kg or somewhat higher).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document