Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: A case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements

2006 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.J. Bateman ◽  
M.A. Cole ◽  
S. Georgiou ◽  
D.J. Hadley
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akmal Mahazar ◽  
Mohammad Shuhaimi-O ◽  
Ahmad Abas Kutty ◽  
Mohamed Nor Mohamed De

1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hosoi ◽  
Y. Kido ◽  
H. Nagira ◽  
H. Yoshida ◽  
Y. Bouda

The inflow of pollutant load from urban areas and the stagnation of water due to sea water intrusion cause the deterioration of river water quality in tidal zone. In order to improve water quality, various measures such as the reduction of pollutant load by sewage systems, discharge control from sewage treatment plants considering river flow, nutrient removal by aquatic plants, and the dredging of bottom sediments have been examined. The choice of these measures depends on the situation of the river environment and finances. In this study, a field survey was carried out in a typical urban river basin, first. Secondly, on the basis of this survey, a mathematical model was formed to simulate flow and water quality. Several purification alternatives designed for the investigated river basin were comparatively evaluated from the viewpoint of the effect of water quality improvement and their cost. Finally, they were prioritized. Through this case study, a planning process of river water quality management was shown.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 5630-5644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adamu Mustapha ◽  
Ahmad Zaharin Aris ◽  
Hafizan Juahir ◽  
Mohammad Firuz Ramli ◽  
Nura Umar Kura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document