Prospective 1-Year Follow-Up Study Comparing Joint Prosthesis With Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty in Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1369-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ulrich-Vinther ◽  
H. Puggaard ◽  
B. Lange
Keyword(s):  
Joint Prosthesis ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Tendon Interposition

Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint Treated by Bilateral Tendon Interposition Arthroplasty

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. DAMEN ◽  
B. VAN DER LEI ◽  
P. H. ROBINSON
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Results ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Joint ◽  
Flexor Carpi Radialis ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Tendon Interposition

Twenty-four flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon interposition arthroplasties of the trapezium for bilateral trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis were reviewed. Pain was reduced in all cases. Function was improved in all right hands and in 92% of the left hands. FCR tendon interposition arthroplasty for bilateral trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis yields satisfactory long-term results on both sides.

Twenty-Year Follow-up Study on a Patient-Fitted Temporomandibular Joint Prosthesis: The Techmedica/TMJ Concepts Device

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 952-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry M. Wolford ◽  
Louis G. Mercuri ◽  
Emet D. Schneiderman ◽  
Reza Movahed ◽  
Will Allen
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Joint Prosthesis ◽  
Follow Up Study

TRAPEZIECTOMY WITH LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND TENDON INTERPOSITION: A MINIMUM 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 365-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby Vinycomb ◽  
John Crock
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Participant Satisfaction ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Alternative Techniques ◽  
Objective Outcomes ◽  
Tendon Interposition

Purpose: To investigate the long-term (> 10 yrs) outcomes of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods: We reviewed 15 cases of trapeziectomy with LRTI performed for the treatment trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Mean follow up was 13.5 yrs (range, 10.5–17.5 yrs). We assessed a number of subjective and objective outcomes. A good outcome was a participant who did not require revision surgery, was satisfied with the outcome of their surgery and did not experience rest pain. Results: No patients had revision surgery and only two patients were unsatisfied or very unsatisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Pain with activity was the strongest predictor of participant satisfaction. Discussion: Approximately half the participants in this study experienced good long-term outcomes. Some participants were experiencing long-term symptoms, particularly pain, despite reporting that they are satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Alternative techniques should be investigated that provide superior long-term outcomes.

Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Cebrian-Gomez ◽  
Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla ◽  
Emilio Sebastia-Forcada ◽  
Fernando A. Lopez-Prats
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Tendon Interposition ◽  
Mid Term Results ◽  
Dash Questionnaire

We compared 84 patients with the Ivory trapeziometacarpal prosthesis versus 62 with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis. There were 134 women and 12 men with a mean age of 60 years. Prospective clinical assessment was made using the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analogue scale for pain, range of motion, and grip and pinch strength. The mean follow-up was 4 years (range 2–5). Prosthetic replacement provided significantly better thumb abduction, adduction, pinch strength, QuickDASH, pain relief, satisfaction and a faster return to daily activities and previous work. Revision surgery was required for two patients in the prosthesis group, two for dislocation and one cup loosening, while in the ligament reconstruction group there were no revisions. We conclude that trapeziometacarpal prosthesis provides better mid-term results in terms of function compared with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for patients with Stages 2 and 3 osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Level of evidence: II

FIVE TO EIGHT YEARS FOLLOW-UP FOR TRAPEZIECTOMY AND WEILBY LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF TRAPEZIOMETACARPAL OSTEOARTHRITIS

Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (03) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. C. Bidwai ◽  
W. J. Marlow ◽  
Y. Khan ◽  
M. Waseem
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Interposition Arthroplasty ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Joint ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
And Function

Trapeziectomy and Weilby ligament reconstruction is a recognized treatment for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Studies published using this procedure have limited follow-up post-surgery. In this series of 24 cases assessed objectively and 36 subjectively with a minimum follow-up of five years, patients continue to have pain relief and function comparable to the opposite non-operated hand. Patient satisfaction is high at 92% and the rate of complications is low. Despite these encouraging results the need for interposition arthroplasty and/or ligament reconstruction in addition to trapeziectomy alone is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document