Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester vs Polypropylene

Author(s):  
Jeesun Lee ◽  
Sumin Oh ◽  
Myung Jae Jeon
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pınar Solmaz Hasdemir ◽  
Tevfik Guvenal ◽  
Hasan Tayfun Ozcakir ◽  
Faik Mumtaz Koyuncu ◽  
Gonul Dinc Horasan ◽  
...  

Aim.Comparison of the rate of wound complications, pain, and patient satisfaction based on used subcuticular suture material.Methods.A total of 250 consecutive women undergoing primary and repeat cesarean section with low transverse incision were prospectively included. The primary outcome was wound complication rate including infection, dehiscence, hematoma, and hypertrophic scar formation within a 6-week period after operation. Secondary outcomes were skin closure time, the need for use of additional analgesic agent, pain score on numeric rating scale, cosmetic score, and patient scar satisfaction scale.Results.Absorbable polyglactin was used in 108 patients and nonabsorbable polypropylene was used in 142 patients. Wound complication rates were similar in primary and repeat cesarean groups based on the type of suture material. Skin closure time is longer in nonabsorbable suture material group in both primary and repeat cesarean groups. There was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative pain, need for additional analgesic use, late phase pain, and itching at the scar. Although the cosmetic results tended to be better in the nonabsorbable group in primary surgery patients, there was no significant difference in the visual satisfaction of the patients.Conclusions.Absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials are comparable in cesarean section operation skin closure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina G. Gabra ◽  
Veronica Winget ◽  
Mohammad T. Torabi ◽  
Ilana Addis ◽  
Kenneth Hatch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pelvic organ prolapse can be repaired vaginally or laparoscopically. Studies comparing vaginal repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or uterosacral ligament suspension (V-USLS) have found no difference in functional or adverse outcomes. Laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS) is becoming a popular treatment for pelvic organ prolapse because it has a low rate of ureteral compromise. To date, no studies have compared perioperative outcomes between L-USLS and SSLF. The objective of this study is to compare the rates of perioperative complications between these two methods. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of 243 consecutive patients who underwent L-USLS or SSLF at one institution between March 2017 and August 2019 for apical pelvic organ prolapse. Descriptive data was analyzed as appropriate with Student’s t tests and chi-square. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of perioperative complications. Results Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Stage (POP-Q) was similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.23). After adjusting for confounding factors, L-USLS was associated with a longer operative time (118 vs 142 min, p < 0.01) and shorter length of hospitalization (0.68 vs 1.06 days, p < 0.01). The estimated blood loss between the procedures was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors. There was no difference in perioperative complication rates between L-USLS and SSLF (5% vs 7%, p = 0.55). No clinical risk factors were significantly associated with perioperative complications. Conclusion We did not find a difference in complications between L-USLS and SSLF.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Gabra ◽  
Veronica Winget ◽  
Mohammad T Torabi ◽  
Ilana Addis ◽  
Kenneth Hatch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pelvic organ prolapse can be repaired vaginally or laparoscopically. Studies comparing vaginal repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) or uterosacral ligament suspension (V-USLS) have found no difference in functional or adverse outcomes. Laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS) is becoming a popular treatment for pelvic organ prolapse because it has a low rate of ureteral compromise. To date, no studies have compared perioperative outcomes between L-USLS and SSLF. The objective of this study is to compare the rates of perioperative complications (intraoperative and postoperative complications) between these two methods.Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of 243 consecutive patients who underwent L-USLS or SSLF at one institution between 3/2017 and 8/2019 for apical pelvic organ prolapse. Descriptive data was analyzed as appropriate with student t-tests and Chi Square. Univariable Logistic Regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of perioperative complications.Results: Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Stage (POP-Q) was similar between the two cohorts (p=0.23). After adjusting for confounding factors, L-USLS was associated with a longer operative time (118 vs 142 min, p <0.01) and shorter length of hospitalization (0.68 vs 1.06 days, p <0.01). The estimated blood loss between the procedures was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors. There was no difference in perioperative complication rates between L-USLS and SSLF (5% vs 7%, p = 0.55). No clinical risk factors were significantly associated with perioperative complications.Conclusion: We did not find a difference in complications between L-USLS and SSLF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. S857
Author(s):  
M. Youngstrom ◽  
N. Metcalfe ◽  
K. Falk ◽  
J. Ogorek ◽  
E. Chahine

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 541-545
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Smith ◽  
Charles V. Herfel ◽  
Jennifer Yeung ◽  
Abigail Shatkin-Margolis ◽  
Catrina C. Crisp ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document