scholarly journals Long term results of impaction Bone grafting using a synthetic graft (Apapore) in revision hip surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Kumar ◽  
M. Ricks ◽  
Sherif Abouel-Enin ◽  
D.G. Dunlop
2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davey M J M Gerhardt ◽  
Enrico De Visser ◽  
Baudewijn W Hendrickx ◽  
Berend W Schreurs ◽  
Job L C Van Susante

2020 ◽  
Vol 479 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-91
Author(s):  
Jason Verspeek ◽  
Thijs A. Nijenhuis ◽  
Martijn F. L. Kuijpers ◽  
Wim H. C. Rijnen ◽  
B. Willem Schreurs

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 852-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A Edwards ◽  
H.G Pandit ◽  
M.L Grover ◽  
H.J Clarke

2000 ◽  
Vol 82-B (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pekkarinen ◽  
A. Alho ◽  
J. Lepistö ◽  
M. Ylikoski ◽  
P. Ylinen ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Holland ◽  
F.A. Weber

Complete removal of femoral shaft cement during revision hip surgery is a difficult task prone to complications. If the cement bone interface is intact however, is there a place for its preservation and re-use with a new cemented stem? The results are reported of 51 cement within cement femoral stem revisions carried out between 1984 and 1991 with a minimum of 5 years’ follow-up, and a mean of 7.8 years. Excluding patients lost or deceased, 39 hips in 38 patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. Eighty-two percent of these were still functioning in situ, 72% were excellent or good using the HSS scoring system and 97% had no radiological evidence of loosening. Femoral stem failure due to aseptic loosening occurred in 4 cases (10%) between 4 and 12 years after revision. Comparing this series to a previous revision hip series by the senior author, there appears to be no deterioration in long term results using this technique, and a better long term radiological outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document