Do triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal injuries affect the clinical outcome of ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome?

Author(s):  
Masahiro Tatebe ◽  
Michiro Yamamoto ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Katsuyuki Iwatsuki ◽  
Hidemasa Yoneda ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
Hyunseok Seo ◽  
Joo-Yup Lee

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is an important structure for stability of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and shock absorption of ulnocarpal joint. Recent studies on anatomy and biomechanics of TFCC have revealed that the deep fiber of distal radioulnar ligament plays a key role in stabilizing the DRUJ. Clinicians should evaluate the presence of the instability of DRUJ or ulnar impaction syndrome. If necessary, combined TFCC foveal repair and ulnar shortening osteotomy should be performed. This article introduces the authors’ preferred procedure of arthroscopic TFCC repair with satisfactory clinical outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 030-036
Author(s):  
Jung-In Shim ◽  
Jin-Hyung Im ◽  
Han-Vit Kang ◽  
Sung-Hyun Cho ◽  
Joo-Yup Lee

Purpose The relationship between triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear and ulnar impaction syndrome has not been fully understood. We hypothesized that a TFCC tear could change the ulnar variance, which may be the cause of ulnar impaction syndrome. Patients and Methods A total of 72 patients who underwent TFCC foveal repair between January 2011 and June 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 44 patients diagnosed with TFCC foveal tear with distal radioulnar joint instability and no ulnar impaction syndrome underwent TFCC foveal repair only (group A) and 28 patients diagnosed with TFCC foveal tear with ulnar impaction syndrome underwent TFCC foveal repair and ulnar shortening osteotomy simultaneously (group B). We measured their ulnar variances in preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up plain radiography. We also compared them with the ulnar variance of the contralateral (uninjured) wrist. Postoperative clinical outcomes, such as range of motions of the wrist, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, grip strength, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, were assessed. Results Ulnar variance increased after TFCC tears compared with that on the uninjured side in both groups (group A: 0.98 vs. 0.52 mm, p = 0.013; group B: 2.71 vs. 2.13 mm, p = 0.001). Once the TFCC was repaired, ulnar variance decreased (group A: 0.98 to 0.01 mm, p < 0.01; group B: 2.71 to 0.64 mm, p < 0.01). However, it was increased on the last follow-up radiograph (group A: 0.01 to 0.81 mm, p < 0.01; group B: 0.64 to 1.05 mm, p = 0.004). There were no significant improvement of range of motion, except for pronation–supination motion (p = 0.04). Mean grip strength increased from 56.8 to 70.8% of the contralateral unaffected hand at the last assessment (p = 0.01). Mean VAS for pain decreased from 7.4 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 2.7 ± 2 postoperatively (p = 0.001). The QuickDASH score significantly improved from 45 to 9 (p = 0.001). Conclusion Ulnar variance may be changed after a TFCC tear. In our study, it decreased after TFCC foveal repair. However, as time went on, the ulnar variance increased again, which could be one of the causes of ulnar impaction syndrome and ulnar-sided wrist pain. Level of Evidence This is a therapeutic Level IV study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Herold ◽  
Frank Unglaub ◽  
Kai Megerle ◽  
Holger Erne ◽  
Steffen Löw

Background Arthroscopic debridement of the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) is well accepted in patients with ulnar impaction syndrome with central TFC lesions. Treatment remains controversial, however, when there is no such lesion from radiocarpal view. Purpose This study assessed the clinical outcome of arthroscopic central TFC resection and debridement and secondary ulnar shortening in patients with ulnar impaction with central TFC lesion compared with patients without TFC lesion. Patients and Methods Thirty-two consecutive patients with ulnar impaction syndrome were arthroscopically treated, 16 of whom had a central lesion of the TFC that was debrided. In the 16 patients with no lesion from the radiocarpal view, the TFC was centrally resected and debrided to decompress the ulnocarpal joint. Persisting symptoms necessitated ulnar shortening in four patients in each group. Two patients underwent repeat arthroscopic TFC debridement. All patients were examined at 3, 6, and 12 months, and at final follow-up (mean: 1.7 years) following arthroscopy, respectively ulnar shortening or hardware removal. Results In both groups, pain, Krimmer, and DASH scores significantly improved. Improvements of DASH scores were significantly higher in patients without lesion at 12 months and at final follow-up. For other parameters, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion In both situations, with and without central TFC lesion, resection and debridement sufficiently reduced the ulnar-sided wrist pain and improved function in three out of four patients, and therefore qualified as the first-line treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome as arthroscopy is performed, anyway. Those patients who complained of persisting or recurrent ulnar-sided wrist pain finally benefitted from ulnar shortening osteotomy as the secondary procedure. Level of Evidence Therapeutic III, case–control study.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1108-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Iwatsuki ◽  
Masahiro Tatebe ◽  
Michiro Yamamoto ◽  
Takaaki Shinohara ◽  
Ryogo Nakamura ◽  
...  

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 114S-114S
Author(s):  
Loukia K. Papatheodorou ◽  
Mark E. Baratz ◽  
Dean G. Sotereanos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document