scholarly journals Palliative Care Development: The Nepal Model

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Brown ◽  
Fraser Black ◽  
Pradeep Vaidya ◽  
Sudip Shrestha ◽  
Doug Ennals ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Associate Professor and Director Megan F. Liu ◽  
Mu-Hsing Ho ◽  
Senior Lecturer Jed Montayre ◽  
Director-General Ying-Wei Wang ◽  
Head and Professor Chia-Chin Lin

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. S41-S45
Author(s):  
Aibek Mukambetov ◽  
Taalaigul Sabyrbekova ◽  
Lola Asanalieva ◽  
Ilim Sadykov ◽  
Stephen R. Connor

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Nicole Baur ◽  
Carlos Centeno ◽  
Eduardo Garralda ◽  
Stephen Connor ◽  
David Clark

Background: Despite growing interest from policy makers, researchers and activists in the global development of palliative care, there is still little science to underpin it. This study presents the methods deployed in the creation of a ‘world map’ of palliative care development. Building on two previous iterations, with improved rigour and taking into account reviewers’ feedback, the aim of this recalibrated version of the study is to determine the level of palliative care development in 198 United Nations recognised countries in 2017, whilst ensuring comparability with previous versions. We present methods of data collection and analysis. Methods and analysis: Primary data on the level of palliative care development in 2017 was collected from in-country experts through an online questionnaire and, where required, supplemented by published documentary sources and grey literature. Data relating to the total population of each country as well as per capita opioid consumption were derived from independent sources. Data analysis was conducted according to a new scoring system and algorithm developed by the research team.   Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the University of Glasgow College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee. Findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, as a contribution to the second edition of the Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End-of-Life, and via social media, including the Glasgow End of Life Studies Group blog and the project website. Limitations of the study: There are potential biases associated with self-reporting by key in-country experts. In some countries, the identified key expert failed to complete the questionnaire in whole or part and data limitations were potentially compounded by language restrictions, as questionnaires were available only in three European languages. The study relied in part on data from independent sources, the accuracy of these data could not be verified.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 463-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Centeno ◽  
David Clark ◽  
Thomas Lynch ◽  
Javier Racafort ◽  
David Praill ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1313-1320.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Y. Rhee ◽  
Eduardo Garralda ◽  
Eve Namisango ◽  
Emmanuel Luyirika ◽  
Liliana de Lima ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ela ◽  
Jose Espinosa ◽  
Marisa Martínez-Muñoz ◽  
Cristina Lasmarías ◽  
Elba Beas ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Powell ◽  
F. N. Mwangi-Powell ◽  
F. Kiyange ◽  
L. Radbruch ◽  
R. Harding

Healthcare ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Pereira ◽  
Amélia Ferreira ◽  
José Martins

Background: The narrow link between practice, education, and research is essential to palliative care development. In Portugal, academic postgraduate publications are the main booster for palliative care research. Methods: This is a bibliometric study that aims to identify Portuguese palliative care postgraduate academic work published in electronic academic repositories between 2000 and 2015. Results: 488 publications were identified. The number of publications has increased, especially in the last five years. The most frequently used method was quantitative, healthcare professionals were the most studied participants, and psychological and psychiatric aspects of care comprised the most current theme. Practice-based priorities are financial costs and benefits of palliative care, awareness and understanding of palliative care, underserved populations, best practices, communication, and palliative care in nonhospital settings. Conclusion: The number of palliative care postgraduate academic publications has increased in Portugal in the past few years. There is academic production in the eight domains of quality palliative care and on the three levels of recommendation for practice-based research priorities. The major research gaps in Portugal are at the system and societal context levels.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Y. Rhee ◽  
Eduardo Garralda ◽  
Eve Namisango ◽  
Emmanuel Luyirika ◽  
Liliana de Lima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document