scholarly journals Referral Patterns and Symptom Profile of Advanced Cancer Patients on Palliative Care Presenting to Emergency Department in a Metropolitan Tertiary Care Cancer Center in a Developing Country

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. e124-e125
Author(s):  
Shamali Poojary ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
Anuja Damani ◽  
Arunangshu Ghoshal ◽  
Naveen Salins ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
YuJung Kim ◽  
Grace S. Ahn ◽  
Hak Ro Kim ◽  
Beodeul Kang ◽  
Sung Soun Hur ◽  
...  

53 Background: Acute Palliative Care Units (ACPUs) are novel inpatient programs in tertiary care centers that provide aggressive symptom management and assist transition to hospice. However, patients often die in the APCU before successfully transferring to hospice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the symptom burden and characteristics of advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all advanced cancer patients admitted to the APCU between April, 2015 and March, 2016 at a tertiary cancer center in Korea. Basic characteristics and symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were obtained from consultation upon APCU admission. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare patients who died in the APCU with those who were discharged alive. Results: Of the 267 patients analyzed, 87 patients (33%) died in the APCU. The median age of patients was 66 (range, 23-97). Patients who died in the APCU had higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (6 vs 5, P = 0.002), dyspnea (4 vs 2, P = 0.001), anorexia (8 vs 6, P = 0.014) and insomnia (6 vs 4, P = 0.001) compared to patients who discharged alive. Total symptom distress scores (SDS) were also significantly higher (47 vs 40, P = 0.001). Patients who died in the APCU were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] for female patients 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.67, P < 0.001) and have higher ESAS scores of drowsiness (OR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.08-3.99, P = 0.029) and dyspnea (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.26-3.80, P = 0.005). These patients showed significantly shorter survival after APCU admission (7 days vs 31 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients who die in the APCU are more likely to be male and have significantly higher symptom burden that include drowsiness and dyspnea. These patients show rapid clinical deterioration after APCU admission. More proactive and timely end-of-life care is needed for these patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 693
Author(s):  
Isabelle Marcelin ◽  
Caroline McNaughton ◽  
Nicole Tang ◽  
Jeffrey Caterino ◽  
Corita Grudzen

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ◽  
Mark T. Hegel ◽  
Tim Ahles

AbstractObjective:The purpose of this study was to understand oncology clinicians' perspectives about the care of advanced cancer patients following the completion of the ENABLE II (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) randomized clinical trial (RCT) of a concurrent oncology palliative care model.Method:This was a qualitative interview study of 35 oncology clinicians about their approach to patients with advanced cancer and the effect of the ENABLE II RCT.Results:Oncologists believed that integrating palliative care at the time of an advanced cancer diagnosis enhanced patient care and complemented their practice. Self-assessment of their practice with advanced cancer patients comprised four themes: (1) treating the whole patient, (2) focusing on quality versus quantity of life, (3) “some patients just want to fight,” and (4) helping with transitions; timing is everything. Five themes comprised oncologists' views on the complementary role of palliative care: (1) “refer early and often,” (2) referral challenges: “Palliative” equals “hospice”; “Heme patients are different,” (3) palliative care as consultants or co-managers, (4) palliative care “shares the load,” and (5) ENABLE II facilitated palliative care integration.Significance of results:Oncologists described the RCT as holistic and complementary, and as a significant factor in adopting concurrent care as a standard of care.


2021 ◽  
pp. 80-81
Author(s):  
.Ajay Kumar Kondeti ◽  
Ambedkar Yadala

Objectives: Family Caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients often suffer from impaired quality of life (QOL) due to stress arising from the responsibility of care giving. Thus, in this study we assessed family caregivers (FCs) quality of life and its association with demographic variables during inpatient palliative care (IPC) of their advanced cancer patients. Material and Methods: 211 FCs of advanced cancer patients were assessed using either English or Telugu versions of the Caregiver Quality of Life Cancer (CQOLC) index scales to evaluate their QOL. We used descriptive and correlation analyses to obtain statistical results.. Results: The summative mean CQOLC score was 54.42+/- 19.7. Statistically signicant higher scores were observed for FCs who reside in rural regions (p=0.27) and those who belong to Below poverty line (BPL) families (p=0.035) suggesting poor quality of life among these groups. High CQOLC score was noticed for socially backward (OBC's, SC and ST castes) communities, but statistically not signicant (p=0.210). Conclusion: FCs from rural regions and lower income groups experience poor QOL. Regular assessment, resource support and specialist care are needed for improving FCs quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document