Educational level and socioeconomic status in patients born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A population-based study

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 2293-2296
Author(s):  
Carmen Mesas Burgos ◽  
Elin Öst ◽  
Henrik Ehrén ◽  
Björn Frenckner
2003 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie M Jaillard ◽  
Véronique Pierrat ◽  
Angélina Dubois ◽  
Patrick Truffert ◽  
Pierre Lequien ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 959-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
C CANNON ◽  
G DILDY ◽  
R WARD ◽  
M VARNER ◽  
D DUDLEY

Teratology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudine P. Torfs ◽  
Cynthia J. R. Curry ◽  
Thomas F. Bateson ◽  
Louis H. Honoré

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam ◽  
Sanne Rasmussen ◽  
Peter Fentz Haastrup ◽  
Kaspar Suadicani ◽  
Jens Søndergaard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A prerequisite for general practitioners (GPs) being able to refer patients with gynecological cancer alarm symptoms for further investigations is that individuals present the symptoms to the GP. Not all symptoms are presented to the GP, and knowledge of barriers for healthcare-seeking is sparse. The aim of this study was to analyze associations between age, socioeconomic status, and common barriers (“being too embarrassed”, “being too busy”, “worried about wasting the doctors time” and “worried what the GP might find”) towards GP contact with gynecological alarm symptoms. Methods Nationwide population-based study in Denmark based on a random sample of 51 090 women aged 20 years or older. A web-based questionnaire regarding experience of four predefined alarm symptoms of gynecological cancer, decisions about contact to GPs, and barriers towards GP contact was distributed. Information about socioeconomic status was collected from Statistics Denmark. Results A total of 26 466 women (54.5%) completed the questionnaire. The proportion of women with no contact to the GP varied between 64.6% and 78.1% for postmenopausal bleeding and pain during intercourse, respectively. Between 32.3% (bleeding during intercourse) and 45.3% (postmenopausal bleeding) of the women reported no barriers for GP contact. The proportions of reported barriers ranged from 7.5% for being too embarrassed (pelvic pain) to 26.8% for being too busy (bleeding during intercourse). Women aged 40–59 years had lower odds of reporting “being too embarrassed” and “worried about wasting the GP´s time”, while women aged 60 + years of age had lower odds of reporting “being too busy” compared to the youngest age group. Women in the highest income groups had lower odds of reporting “being too embarrassed” and “wasting the GP´s time” compared to those with a low income, while those with high educational level had lower odds of reporting “being too embarrassed” and “worried what the GP might find” compared to those with low educational level. Conclusions More than half of the respondents with no contact to the GP, reported one or more barriers towards GP contact. Lower age and socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher odds of reporting barriers. As this may explain the differences in healthcare seeking behavior, healthcare planners, policy makers and clinicians should be aware of these findings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 140349482110608
Author(s):  
Anu Molarius ◽  
Mikael Hasselgren

Aim: To examine differences in the prevalence of self-reported diagnosed asthma by socioeconomic status and the contribution of lifestyle factors to these differences. Methods: The study was based on 28,531 persons aged 18 years or older who answered a survey questionnaire sent to a random population sample in mid-Sweden in 2017. The overall response rate was 44%. Socioeconomic status was measured with educational level and economic difficulties, and lifestyle factors with physical activity, smoking, snuff use, risk-drinking of alcohol and obesity. The associations between socioeconomic status and asthma were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: The overall asthma prevalence was 9% among women and 7% in men and decreased with increasing age. Educational level was not independently associated with asthma, but a statistically significant odds ratio (with 95% confidence intervals) for the prevalence of asthma was observed for economic difficulties 1.5 (1.3–1.7). Also, physical inactivity 1.2 (1.1–1.3) and obesity 1.6 (1.4–1.8) were associated with increased asthma prevalence. Smoking and risk-drinking were not statistically significantly associated with asthma whereas snuff users had a higher prevalence of asthma among women. Adjusting for lifestyle factors did not affect the association between socioeconomic status and asthma. Conclusions: In this population-based study, self-reported diagnosed asthma was independently associated with economic difficulties but not with educational level. Lifestyle factors did not explain the association between economic difficulties and asthma prevalence. This applies to both men and women as well as younger and older age groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document